Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-28-2005, 10:15 PM
Mr_J Mr_J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 639
Default Re: That which we shall not speak of - or shall we?

"Thus, "that we shall not speak of" is not only probable, it is a certainty. It HAS to happen to me, you, and everybody. It's just a matter of time..."

Wrong. There is the chance someone will never experience a decent losing streak in their life. Would be very close to 100% for a regular player, but it is not a certainty.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-28-2005, 10:54 PM
eagle eagle is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 16
Default Re: That which we shall not speak of - or shall we?


I'll be the first one to validate everything discussed today. I got home from work. Read the posts. Went out totally focused and proceeded to drop 50 BB in one hour of limit.

So I just imagined 50 BB spread over a lifetime of play and laughed.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-28-2005, 11:10 PM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 382
Default Re: That which we shall not speak of - or shall we?

Daliman is the 2+2 pioneer of speaking in the third person. Daliman used to do it all the time, but it is not the easiest thing to keep up.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-28-2005, 11:22 PM
eagle eagle is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 16
Default Re: That which we shall not speak of - or shall we?

Could it be you were "Jimmy" on Seinfeld, or is that just a wild rumor?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-28-2005, 11:41 PM
zaphod zaphod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 122
Default Re: That which we shall not speak of - or shall we?

[ QUOTE ]
I asked my father, a distinguished professor, how can he explain what happened. "There is a saying, son":
" It is impossible that the improbable should never happen !!"".
This can be proved mathematically, he explained.

[/ QUOTE ]

Clearly you are talkin about the "Infinte Improbability Drive" here. For those of you that don't know it, here is a quote from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:


[ QUOTE ]
This, briefly, is the story of its discovery.

The principle of generating small amounts of finite improbability by simply hooking the logic circuits of a Bambleweeny 57 sub-meson Brain to an atomic vector plotter suspended in a strong Brownian Motion producer (say a nice hot cup of tea) were of course well understood - and such generators were often used to break the ice at parties by making all the molicules in the hostess's undergarments leap simultaneously one foot to the left, in accordance with the Theory of Indeterminacy.

Many respectable physicists said that they weren't going to stand for this - partly because it was a debasement of science, but mostly because they didn't get invited to those sort of parties.

Another thing they couldn't stand was the perpetual failure they encountered in trying to construct a machine which could generate the infinite improbability field needed to flip a spaceship across the mind-paralysing distances between the furthest stars, and in the end they grumpily announced that such a machine was virtually imposssible.

Then, one day, a student who had been left to sweep up the lab after a particulary unsuccessful party found himself reasoning this way:

If, he thought to himself, such amachine is a virtual impossibility, then it must logically be a finite improbability. So all I have to do in order to make one, is to work out exactly how improbable it is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give it a fresh cup of really hot tea ... and turn it on!

He did this, and was rather startled to discover that he had managed to create the long sought after golden Infinite Improbability generater out of thin air.

It startled him even more when just after he was awarded the Galactic Institute's Prize for Extreme Cleverness he got lynced by a rampaging mob of respectable physicists who had finally realized that the one thing they really couldn't stand was a smartass.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-01-2005, 02:35 AM
timprov timprov is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 88
Default Re: That which we shall not speak of - or shall we?

Which head decided to post this? You should know better than to talk about the IID here. Pretty soon everyone will have one and it will kill online poker.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-01-2005, 04:08 AM
TheAmp TheAmp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 171
Default Re: That which we shall not speak of - or shall we?

Nice. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-01-2005, 06:26 AM
lacky lacky is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: That which we shall not speak of - or shall we?

i was in a multi and my 1st 4 hands were 23o, mucked it all 4 times, and it would have won all 4.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.