|
View Poll Results: Keep the \' ? | |||
No, it's messy | 23 | 38.33% | |
Of course, it's tradition | 37 | 61.67% | |
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A little confused....
True, you can write bots that vary their play. It's already done - it's still tough as crap to do it correctly though. Good luck creating 1 solid winning style, much less 5. It takes years of hard work.
It's true you could probably make a winning low limit bot right now with some decent effort - but to beat tougher opponents, it's going to take a lot of research and programming effort. Machine-learning is slow and very difficult to implement correctly. |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A little confused....
My comments are against the thought that a bot couldn't play poker successfully. I know there isn't a good bot out now, but I disagree with the idea that is out there - that humans must be better than bots because of the very nature of poker.
This comes from Kasparov in one of the Deep Blue games: After seeing a move from on-the-defensive Deep Blue, Kasparov becomes convinced that Deep Blue is cheating. Humans must be secretly helping it -- because no computer would have selected that move. The man may be the best chess player ever, but he sounds like a guy complaining that his all-in bluff just caught called by the board's low-pair. rabbit |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A little confused....
I'm pretty sure a bot that will win in the long run against any competition isnt that hard to code. That is, once you have defined the rules it should follow. I base this statement on the following.
1) Anything that can be defined in a single answer question can be written as a program. 2) Everything can be defined in such a question. This theorem was defined by Alan Turing and is regarded as a base in most areas in computer sience. So where does this leave us? That all that is needed is a progam that for every possible situation can answer the following questions. 1) Should I fold? 2) Should I raise? 3) Should I call/check? Clearly the amount of information given isnt enough to answer this (no difference between a bot or a human), but a bot can from every situation use game theory to approximate the best answer. Sure, a human being can do this too, but we dont have the ability to be as precise as a computer and we let our emotions affect our thoughts. |
|
|