Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Keep the \' ?
No, it's messy 23 38.33%
Of course, it's tradition 37 61.67%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 02-28-2005, 05:09 PM
gomberg gomberg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 22
Default Re: A little confused....

True, you can write bots that vary their play. It's already done - it's still tough as crap to do it correctly though. Good luck creating 1 solid winning style, much less 5. It takes years of hard work.

It's true you could probably make a winning low limit bot right now with some decent effort - but to beat tougher opponents, it's going to take a lot of research and programming effort. Machine-learning is slow and very difficult to implement correctly.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 02-28-2005, 05:37 PM
nnoobi nnoobi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: A little confused....

My comments are against the thought that a bot couldn't play poker successfully. I know there isn't a good bot out now, but I disagree with the idea that is out there - that humans must be better than bots because of the very nature of poker.

This comes from Kasparov in one of the Deep Blue games:
After seeing a move from on-the-defensive Deep Blue, Kasparov becomes convinced that Deep Blue is cheating. Humans must be secretly helping it -- because no computer would have selected that move.

The man may be the best chess player ever, but he sounds like a guy complaining that his all-in bluff just caught called by the board's low-pair.


rabbit
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 02-28-2005, 06:58 PM
Loveless Loveless is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1
Default Re: A little confused....

I'm pretty sure a bot that will win in the long run against any competition isnt that hard to code. That is, once you have defined the rules it should follow. I base this statement on the following.

1) Anything that can be defined in a single answer question can be written as a program.
2) Everything can be defined in such a question.

This theorem was defined by Alan Turing and is regarded as a base in most areas in computer sience.

So where does this leave us? That all that is needed is a progam that for every possible situation can answer the following questions.
1) Should I fold?
2) Should I raise?
3) Should I call/check?

Clearly the amount of information given isnt enough to answer this (no difference between a bot or a human), but a bot can from every situation use game theory to approximate the best answer. Sure, a human being can do this too, but we dont have the ability to be as precise as a computer and we let our emotions affect our thoughts.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.