|
|
#43
02-27-2005, 04:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: \"I have an 8.7/100 winrate at 3-6 and a 42.5/100 winrate at 2-4.\"
The-Matador, if I were you I would probably just stfu. There is not one thing you could say that could make anyone think your smart, after all the [censored] you posted in this thread.
|
|
#44
02-27-2005, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"I have an 8.7/100 winrate at 3-6 and a 42.5/100 winrate at 2-4.\"
your ( P ) Pronunciation Key (yr, yôr, yr; yr when unstressed)
adj. The possessive form of you. Used as a modifier before a noun: your boots; your accomplishments. A person's; one's: The light switch is on your right. Informal. Used with little or no sense of possession to indicate a type familiar to the listener: your basic three-story frame house. you're ( P ) Pronunciation Key (yr; yr when unstressed) Contraction of you are.
|
|
#45
02-27-2005, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"I have an 8.7/100 winrate at 3-6 and a 42.5/100 winrate at 2-4.\"
[ QUOTE ]
That's a quote from Michael Davis that you can find here. He claims these numbers are based on a sample of more than 100k hands, so they are consistent. I asked him to simply post a screenshot and he has not yet done so. Anyways, I happen to think it's one of the funniest posts of all time and I thought I would share. [/ QUOTE ] I did the same thing when you were lying about your Winrates as CinnamonWind(and pretending to be a girl...), and you told me you had nothing to prove to me or anybody else. You found it offensive that I even mention you posting a screenshot. I guess you've changed your tune? -James
|
|
#46
02-27-2005, 05:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"I have an 8.7/100 winrate at 3-6 and a 42.5/100 winrate at 2-4.\"
This was actually not bad for a first post. I was ammused.
[ QUOTE ] I guess this is an appropriate way for me to pop my post cherry, that is, creating a post which serves absolutely no purpose, which is roughly what 60% of posts here do. [/ QUOTE ] Welcome to the wonderful world of internet message boards. To be fair, I think this place is certainly better than most. And your statement totally depends on the forum. But here I go proving yr point. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Oh well, welcome to the boards!
|
|
#47
02-27-2005, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"I have an 8.7/100 winrate at 3-6 and a 42.5/100 winrate at 2-4.\"
[ QUOTE ]
I don't even see why the 'Put your dick away' comments were vile either. Totally justified, to be honest. [/ QUOTE ] It's not just that. But if you guys would rather have the Matador and all of his abusive behavior, perhaps I'm in the wrong forum. TSC might have had the right idea after all.
|
|
#49
02-27-2005, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"I have an 8.7/100 winrate at 3-6 and a 42.5/100 winrate at 2-4.\"
[ QUOTE ]
/me shrugs. I was judging the thread on its own merits. MD was being the dick. Apparently The Matador has been banned anyway.. [/ QUOTE ] Seems like it [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] What is the o/u until it is back?
|
|
#50
02-27-2005, 08:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: \"I have an 8.7/100 winrate at 3-6 and a 42.5/100 winrate at 2-4.\"
[ QUOTE ]
But if you guys would rather have the Matador and all of his abusive behavior, perhaps I'm in the wrong forum. [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't rather have him, I'd like to have you guys both here, cuz you should both have the opportunity to post here if he wants to make a serious effort to contribute here.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
