"I have an 8.7/100 winrate at 3-6 and a 42.5/100 winrate at 2-4."

[The-Matador]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


No, you didn't. It's down. Click the link in the top left corner that says "Terms and Conditions" and it will take you to an error page.

It's right here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Click the link at the TOP of the page in the center.
It's not down.

It's right below where it says, "The 2+2 Forums"



Link

[/ QUOTE ]

"you may not post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, profane, or otherwise objectionable information of any kind "

I am going to go out on a limb here and say that posting PMs and people's nicks would qualify.

[The-Matador]

[ QUOTE ]
When you think about it, if he played 8 hours a day, only 5 days a week, 48 weeks a year

40 hrs/wk of multitabling is not ONLY. That's a very big number to do long-term. After a year or so, you'd most likely experience some burnout.

I do think an extremely good player who is able to crush mid-limit games could 4-table 3/6 with very, very little mental effort, but for someone who is actually playing 3/6, that would be quite a feat to do for over a year.

GoT

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, I do 40 hours a week on the side of a highly stressful job. Doesn't seem too onerous to me.

Besides that's not the point. The point is that he is lying about his winrates.

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]

"you may not post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, profane, or otherwise objectionable information of any kind "

I am going to go out on a limb here and say that posting PMs and people's nicks would qualify.

[/ QUOTE ]


That is way out on a limb, because most of your posts have at least 2 of those things in them.

Otherwise objectionable is completely up to them.
Personally, I find your posts objectionable, yet you keep posting. Perhaps that means your posts are against the TOS for that reason alone? By your definition, yes they are.

Now, I've already spent way more time talking to a troll than I should have this morning, and now my breakfast is getting cold.

Adios.

[The-Matador]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

"you may not post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, profane, or otherwise objectionable information of any kind "

I am going to go out on a limb here and say that posting PMs and people's nicks would qualify.

[/ QUOTE ]


That is way out on a limb, because most of your posts have at least 2 of those things in them.

Otherwise objectionable is completely up to them.
Personally, I find your posts objectionable, yet you keep posting. Perhaps that means your posts are against the TOS for that reason alone? By your definition, yes they are.

Now, I've already spent way more time talking to a troll than I should have this morning, and now my breakfast is getting cold.

Adios.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can *personally* find them objectionable all you like. That doesn't mean they are.

As I said, you seem like the kind of dork who finds lots of things objectionable. I cannot help but picture Comic Book Guy furiously typing "Worst Episode Ever" whenever I read one of your posts.

[GuyOnTilt]

Wow, I do 40 hours a week on the side of a highly stressful job. Doesn't seem too onerous to me.

Okay, now that I think about it, I could log a ton of small stakes games online without burning myself out because they require almost no mental strain on me. In a game where I'm being tested constantly, no. So yeah, I can actually see myself playing 40 hr weeks of 3/6, but that would just be stupid for me from a money perspective. So yeah.

PS. Wait a sec. I used to have you on ignore. How did that get undone?

PPS. Who are you to get on someone's case for lying in a post anyway?

GoT

[The-Matador]

[ QUOTE ]
Wait a sec. I used to have you on ignore. How did that get undone?

GoT

[/ QUOTE ]

I posted hentai porno?

[pistolwhipped]

You know one thing that I find funny about this site? The fact that where it displays number of posts for an individual, there isn't a reference to the number of quality posts. I guess this is an appropriate way for me to pop my post cherry, that is, creating a post which serves absolutely no purpose, which is roughly what 60% of posts here do.

I don't see why so much time is devoted to ridiculous arguments. If you don’t believe the man’s win rate, that’s fine, however, you don’t have to harp on it. You shouldn’t believe anything someone says without them providing evidence in the first place. Those who do not supply the evidence should be ignored. It’s just that simple.

With that being said have a great day!

[The-Matadork]

[ QUOTE ]
Wow, I do 40 hours a week on the side of a highly stressful job. Doesn't seem too onerous to me.

Besides that's not the point. The point is that he is lying about his winrates.

[/ QUOTE ]


40 hours per week, and you only put in 20,000 hands in Feb? that's odd. perhaps you only put in 20,000 hands in winning sessions

i also love that you are finding it so hard to believe michael davis's win rates. the irony kills me.

tmK

[sthief09]

[ QUOTE ]

User has been ignored
You are now ignoring this user. You will no longer see the body of any of their posts.


[/ QUOTE ]

[The-Matador]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

User has been ignored
You are now ignoring this user. You will no longer see the body of any of their posts.


[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Who gives a sh[/i]it?