Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-24-2005, 01:54 PM
kirisim kirisim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 31
Default Re: BIG HAND

"Push preflop" Lawrence? Are you kidding?!

You meant "push on the flop," right?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-24-2005, 02:25 PM
Popinjay Popinjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: www.snipurl.com/popnj
Posts: 819
Default Re: BIG HAND

If you put one of them on a set, which is probably true, you are 33-66 to win. Pushing the flop sounds like a bad idea. Call for the turn only if you think you will get paid off when you hit.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-24-2005, 02:34 PM
vegas vegas is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: BIG HAND

What did the SB do? If he flat calls you could get your price to just call. With three Jacks for a straight you have 12 outs excluding the fact that 3 Aces might be outs as well. So with 12 outs you're 2.9 to 1 to see the turn. So I think it is important to tell us what the SB did.

I forgot that SB was already in for $50. So I take that back you wouldn't get you price if he just calls. I would push on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-24-2005, 02:38 PM
Popinjay Popinjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: www.snipurl.com/popnj
Posts: 819
Default Re: BIG HAND

[ QUOTE ]
What did the SB do? If he flat calls you could get your price to just call. With three Jacks for a straight you have 12 outs excluding the fact that 3 Aces might be outs as well. So with 12 outs you're 2.9 to 1 to see the turn. So I think it is important to tell us what the SB did.

[/ QUOTE ]

The only way you have A outs is if MP has 89h, which I doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-24-2005, 02:49 PM
vegas vegas is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: BIG HAND

[ QUOTE ]

The only way you have A outs is if MP has 89h, which I doubt.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think I understand what you mean. I stated that he has 12 out with three more jacks for the straight but did not think 15 outs was right to add b/c we are not sure that villian does not have a set.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-24-2005, 02:54 PM
Popinjay Popinjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: www.snipurl.com/popnj
Posts: 819
Default Re: BIG HAND

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

The only way you have A outs is if MP has 89h, which I doubt.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think I understand what you mean. I stated that he has 12 out with three more jacks for the straight but did not think 15 outs was right to add b/c we are not sure that villian does not have a set.

[/ QUOTE ]

A = ace, but yea they are definetly not outs here.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-25-2005, 08:16 AM
quix0tic quix0tic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 74
Default Re: BIG HAND

The rule for this situation is usually push. Thats just a heuristic however and there are exceptions to every rule. Going strong with draws is clearly very contingent on fold equity, which I find quite lacking in this spot. Folding is obviously weak with a hand this good. Calling means you are drawing out of position and will be shut out if the turn bricks. Pushing is the obvious good play but it should be said villain seems very likely to have top2, bottom or mid set. All of these hands are going to the felt and you do not have quite the overlay to draw against a set.

My play would be to reraise 350-400, leaving yourself maybe 100. It might seem like a small point but I feel like this bet screams strength a little more and provides marginally higher fold equity. The rest goes in on the turn regardless.

Having said that, I feel like calling is being unfairly bashed here. Against an unimaginitve tight player who will show 77 everytime, calling is a surprisingly good option. Against a trickey lag your fold equity is huge because he could have 89, JQ, small flush, etc. As pretty as the draw is, you are incorrect to push here if villain is 90% to have a set(ABC player). Call, hope for a jack (best) or at least a heart on the turn. Make a weak lead if you hit and check fold if you dont. Tight unimaginitive players incidentally are also ABC and not fantastic hand readers. No way they put you on a gutshot. You have fantastic implied odds for a jack and okay ones for a heart. I know we all want to see both cards with a draw like this but boo-fcking whoo. Wanting don't make it so.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-25-2005, 08:21 AM
Cornell Fiji Cornell Fiji is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 401
Default Re: BIG HAND

Push.

-Steve
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-25-2005, 08:30 AM
quix0tic quix0tic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 74
Default Re: BIG HAND

hes gonna show 77.

-jeff
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-25-2005, 08:49 AM
Ionphore Ionphore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 185
Default Re: BIG HAND

As many players have stated, once MP raises, this is an easy flop push. People who are assuming you are up against a set are wrong. You could just as easily be up against 2 other hands like AK for the Sb and QJ for MP. If you have some reads like MP will only limp and then call raises with pairs, and hes very tight, then I can see folding as a possible option. But against typical opponents my stack is going in.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.