#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rules question about betting in pot limit.
Here's the situation.
=== We're playing pot limit Hold 'Em. We are using white chips worth $1 and red chips worth $5. After the flop, Person A checks. Person B bets $3 with three white chips. Person C calls the $3. Person A raises to $6 using one red chip and one white chip. Person B puts out two red chips in one motion and sweeps back the three white chips in front of him after dropping the two red chips. So there is $10 in front of Person B. Person B does not say anything. Did Person B technically call or raise? === We could not find a ruling on this in our copy of Robert's Rules. Yes, if Person B had verbalized his action, it would have been clear. But that was not the case. For further discussion (clarification), Person C then calls $6 because he thought Person B had called and not raised. Person B then says he raised to $10. === Any information on the rules and how this should be handled is appreciated. Thanks! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rules question about betting in pot limit.
If he doesn't say raise, it is a call. I am pretty sure of this.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rules question about betting in pot limit.
[ QUOTE ]
If he doesn't say raise, it is a call. I am pretty sure of this. [/ QUOTE ] Completely agree. Verbal action is binding. Non-verbal action is interpreted as either check or call. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rules question about betting in pot limit.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If he doesn't say raise, it is a call. I am pretty sure of this. [/ QUOTE ] Completely agree. Verbal action is binding. Non-verbal action is interpreted as either check or call. [/ QUOTE ] I disagree. It's not that simple. A single oversized chip with no verbal action is a call. He threw out two chips in one motion, so that should be a raise. Suppose someone bet $5 (by throwing out a red chip) and you threw out four red chips. That should be interpreted as a raise to $20. As you are stating the rules, without a verbal declaration, it would be taken as a call of $5 which seems ridiculuos. If you threw out a green chip, it would be a call, however. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rules question about betting in pot limit.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If he doesn't say raise, it is a call. I am pretty sure of this. [/ QUOTE ] Completely agree. Verbal action is binding. Non-verbal action is interpreted as either check or call. [/ QUOTE ] I disagree. It's not that simple. A single oversized chip with no verbal action is a call. He threw out two chips in one motion, so that should be a raise. Suppose someone bet $5 (by throwing out a red chip) and you threw out four red chips. That should be interpreted as a raise to $20. As you are stating the rules, without a verbal declaration, it would be taken as a call of $5 which seems ridiculuos. If you threw out a green chip, it would be a call, however. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not so sure. Just last week at foxwoods someone thru out multiple red chips and didn't say anything. The ruling was that it was a call. |
|
|