Am I a total idiot??

abacusse · #1 02-17-2005, 11:06 PM

Have been playing at Party at 1/2 limit and there seems to be something strange going on...

According to Pokertracker I have the following stats...
Hands: 7,842
VPIP: 21.72
VPSB: 40.43
Won WSF: 36.97
Went to SD: 36.93
Won at SD: 47.63

So I play a little loose which I know...
But my question is about certain hands stats...

Hand Times Win% Net (BB)
QQ 32.. 75.. +85
AA 39.. 72.. +65
AKo 63.. 60.. +44
KK 31.. 58.. +20
.....................
AQo 97.. 42.. -16
QTs 27.. 33.. -19
T9s 30.. 27.. -21
JJ 44.. 39.. -45

IS THIS NORMAL??? Losing with JJ, AQo, T9s and QTs???

I suppose some variance can be accounted for but this looks unreal...
Can anybody point me in the right direction or is it just variance???

bear187 · #2 02-17-2005, 11:07 PM

Didn't read the post, but yes.

skoal2k4 · #3 02-17-2005, 11:07 PM

I bet you get a response saying something along the lines of "sample size too small" [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

fluxrad · #4 02-17-2005, 11:09 PM

Sorry man. Your sample size is way to small.

abacusse · #5 02-17-2005, 11:09 PM

Nice to know you to...

abacusse · #6 02-17-2005, 11:10 PM

So when are we talking enough size?

fluxrad · #7 02-17-2005, 11:11 PM

LOL. I have no idea. I was just being a douchebag [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

7,000 hands should be enough.

pokerrookie · #8 02-17-2005, 11:14 PM

100000000000000 should be plenty. At your funeral in 75 years, we will look over your stats and let your spirit know whether you played all those hands incorrectly.

My guess is you won't let your overcards go. JJ and AQ and the others can be beaten. Have to let them go sometimes.

reubenf · #9 02-18-2005, 12:03 AM

[ QUOTE ]
7,000 hands should be enough.

[/ QUOTE ]

The samples in question are 30-100 hands, no?

tiltaholic · #10 02-18-2005, 12:15 AM

yes it is normal.
or rather, it can be normal.
i have about 20000 hands at 1/2, but only 50 of them are KQs. KQs is a $6 loser for me. does that mean i'm unlucky or playing KQs wrong? who knows...but I've only had KQs 50 times. That is nothing.

i've had QTs about 60 times. and it is my second biggest losing hand. could that be normal? maybe. am i overplaying QTs? i think it is possible. but i've only had the hand 60 times. too few to know "statisically speaking".