|
|
#11
02-15-2005, 06:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: protecting your hand, by getting your opponent to raise.
[ QUOTE ]
This related to that KQo post? [/ QUOTE ] hehe not at all...in the KQo post hero was in position the entire time. this situation hero is sandwiched between players. 
|
|
#12
02-15-2005, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: protecting your hand, by getting your opponent to raise.
[ QUOTE ]
in the KQo post hero was in position the entire time. this situation hero is sandwiched between players [/ QUOTE ] I was thinking about the post with KQo in the BB with the aggressor being on his left. He flops mid pair. Where are you sandwiched in this hand? The PFR is on your direct left. b
|
|
#13
02-15-2005, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: protecting your hand, by getting your opponent to raise.
[ QUOTE ]
I was thinking about the post with KQo in the BB with the aggressor being on his left. He flops mid pair. Where are you sandwiched in this hand? The PFR is on your direct left. b [/ QUOTE ] yep you're right. i just remembered hero closing action on every street.
|
|
#15
02-16-2005, 11:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: protecting your hand, by getting your opponent to raise.
its a well known tactic.. just as that raiser will be hoping you bet, so he can raise and force the other out of the pot too.
You need to give you players a lot of credit for this to be reliable.. if i sit at a table of local pro's waiting for the tourists to come in, I'm likely to put this kind of thing to my advantage. It works less often in small stakes and (so i'm told) high-stakes. The more reliable it is as a tacic at your table, the more +EV it is.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
