15/30 tabels at Party

Nice_Guy · #1 02-15-2005, 11:57 PM

I was just at a table with several people who were talking about blatant team play at the 15/30 tables at Party. Both of them said they avoided the 15/30 tables for this reason.

I usually ignore this kind of talk but these guys were pretty convincing.

I'm currently working my way up the levels at Party (limit hold'em). My next move is to 15/30 so I'd like to know if this is a common perception of the 15/30 tables at Party or if these guys were just the same old "internet poker is rigged" wackos.

Thanks

sumdumguy · #2 02-16-2005, 12:20 AM

They are wackos.. or the teams really suck.

surfdoc · #3 02-16-2005, 12:27 AM

I am sure there is a sick amout of cheating going on. That is why the games are so hard to beat. I also hear their collusion software is crap. You will have better luck and games on stars.

AngryCola · #4 02-16-2005, 12:29 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I am sure there is a sick amout of cheating going on.

[/ QUOTE ]

How are you sure?

[ QUOTE ]
You will have better luck and games on stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

So, you are saying one will do better to play the $15/$30 on Stars than on Party?

Yikes.

TobDog · #5 02-16-2005, 12:32 AM

According to posts here(based on level of difficulty), party with occasional cheaters(if thats happening) is easier than Stars with no cheating.

sthief09 · #6 02-16-2005, 12:37 AM

let me guess... that stakes at the game you were playing were lower than 15/30

"I could've fuc[/i]ked a supermodel but she wasn't my type"

Nice_Guy · #7 02-16-2005, 01:23 AM

[ QUOTE ]
You will have better luck and games on stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd believe the wackos before I'd believe this.

Thanks all. Just wanted reassurance.

Simon

nongice626 · #8 02-16-2005, 06:57 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am sure there is a sick amout of cheating going on.

[/ QUOTE ]

How are you sure?

[ QUOTE ]
You will have better luck and games on stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

So, you are saying one will do better to play the $15/$30 on Stars than on Party?

Yikes.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cola. Do you understand this concept:

FVCKING SATIRE?

AngryCola · #9 02-16-2005, 07:04 AM

Yes.

I understand that concept.

But the post I was talking about was not satire.
If it was supposed to be, he failed miserably.

Btw, I don't really care if your thread in OOT is supposed to be satire. It's still stupid.
And you probably won't be on this site very much longer because of it.

nongice626 · #10 02-16-2005, 07:08 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Yes.

I understand that concept.

But the post I was talking about was not satire.

Btw, I don't really care if your thread in OOT is supposed to be satire. It's still stupid.
And you probably won't be on this site very much longer because of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

the post you were replying to was satire. he didnt fail. youre just an idiot.