Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-10-2002, 03:09 PM
CreamPuff CreamPuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 217
Default Re: $100-$200 Hand

Interesting.
I remember a post a while back, in which
you had K9 in the BB. vs. a button raise, and you
played it the same way you describe, but no reason
was given.

In Briers hand would you bet the turn if it had been
a 3rd spade, to prevent a free card?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-10-2002, 03:22 PM
Jim Brier Jim Brier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 189
Default Results

When my opponent failed to bet the turn, I figured my hand was good so I bet. I will get crying calls from worse hands in this shorthanded game. My opponent called. He won with A-K.

I failed to write this hand down after it was played. So David may be right in that I may not have been suited. Against this particular opponent, I probably should have folded preflop.

I find it incomprehensible that my opponent failed to bet the turn after 3-betting the flop. If he thought his A-K was good enough to 3-bet, why is it not good enough to bet the turn when a blank appears?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-10-2002, 03:24 PM
Vehn Vehn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,752
Default Re: Results

Because he knew you would fold?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-10-2002, 03:54 PM
Jim Brier Jim Brier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 189
Default Re: Results

But how could he know this? Furthermore, he is now giving me a free card to beat him which could result in his loss of an entire pot. I like his 3-bet on the flop in this situation but I think he must bet the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-10-2002, 04:04 PM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,247
Default Re: Results

I suspect his check behind on the turn is a reflection of your table image.

Since you stated that you are willing to fold top pair on the turn for a single bet even in this shorthanded headsup situation, it appears his check is reasonable (though debatable) with AK since you are very likely to either fold or checkraise but not call.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-10-2002, 04:09 PM
Penguin Penguin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 28
Default Re: Results

Let's say he figures you for a K (or less) after you checkraise and you call his 3 bet. He may have reason to believe you will fold on the turn to his bet.

So from his perspective, he is giving a free card (to your 3 outs) in exchange for either a sure call by you on the river, or the chance to call your river bet (or even the chance to raise you on the river).

This works out to losing 7 BB one in 15 times vs gaining 1 BB the other 14 times. So if he is pretty sure you will fold the turn, his turn check has some positive expectation.

Maybe (probably?!) this is a mistake on my part - but in his position I have checked the AK too - I figure I am way ahead, and that the check (by raising the suspicion level) will ensure me a river call by a lot of hands including A high or any pair.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-10-2002, 04:59 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Results

This turn check is confusing, but I think it is correct. Although checking runs the risk of both a missed bet and a free card disaster, I think these two factors are outweighed by a few other things.

For one, He probably knows that unless he is beat, it is fairly unlikely that you'll call his turn bet. Also, by checking the turn, you might become more liable to call a river bet out of confusion. In addition, him checking the turn could encourage you to make play on the pot at the river with any number of hands (inducing a bluff).

I think when he checked the turn, he was 90% certain that he had the best hand, so why not raise your river bet? Well, it seems that his raise would only get a call if he was beat, so it really has no value other than making you wonder what he had in the event that you fold.

I think there are a lot of close decisions in this hand, and I can't really criticize any of them. I think Jim and the raiser played the hand well.

Sam
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-10-2002, 05:08 PM
AceHigh AceHigh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,173
Default Re: Results

"I like his 3-bet on the flop in this situation... "

I don't. His 3-bet let's you get away from you're hand. You correctly guessed that you should fold on the turn if you don't improve. His hand is very strong, why should he drive away a customer?

Wouldn't it be better for him to just call your c/r and call your turn and river bets? He can always bet if you check.

Plus he can wait until the river to raise you.

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-10-2002, 05:38 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Results

Although it's hard to tell why a player at that level would check the turn, I think that as a tight and conservative, he respected your raise and call on the flop and therefore decided to play it safe on the turn by checking behind fearing a checkraise from a 2 pair or set. He may have thought that you were ahead at that point and he had to make a crying call on the river otherwise he would have raised you.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-10-2002, 06:27 PM
mikelow mikelow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,707
Default Re: Results

His failure to bet the turn saved you a bet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.