Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2005, 09:09 AM
James Boston James Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 314
Default Party Poker over-protecting against collusion?

Last night, a co-worker and I attempted to play at the same table on Party Poker. This was the first time we attempted this, and it was just in the name of friendly competition. Neither of us have done anything to cause suspicion that we were in collusion. Somehow, Party knew that we knew each other. When I tried to join his table, Party sent me a message saying that an association had been made, and we couldn't play together. Has anyone else experienced this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-04-2005, 09:16 AM
moot moot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ID
Posts: 339
Default Re: Party Poker over-protecting against collusion?

Yeah, my roommate and I tried it, also in the name of sporting competition (actually, if he raised me I was probably gonna turn and see what he had) (but he didn't know that).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-04-2005, 09:29 AM
jaxUp jaxUp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,224
Default Re: Party Poker over-protecting against collusion?

This happened to me and my roommate. I don't really think it's overprotecting though. I would rather not be able to play at the same table as him than be up against 2 (or more!) people who knew what each other had.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-04-2005, 09:31 AM
Michael Davis Michael Davis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 613
Default Re: Party Poker over-protecting against collusion?

Ask them to loosen the restriction. They will.

-Michael
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2005, 09:32 AM
eleventy eleventy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 58
Default Re: Party Poker over-protecting against collusion?

Your IP address were probably from the same block.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-04-2005, 09:33 AM
Piemaster Piemaster is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1
Default Re: Party Poker over-protecting against collusion?

I applaud it. I would rather have the peace of mind knowing that people can't connect with two PCs from the same subnet at once.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2005, 09:45 AM
James Boston James Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 314
Default We weren\'t in the same room

Most of you have mentioned trying to do this with a room-mate or that maybe the IP address had something to do with it. But, we were, geographically speaking, nowhere close to each other. I live 1+hour from him. The only thing I can figure is that we might have logged on from the same computer at work in the past, and it tracked that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2005, 09:47 AM
adamstewart adamstewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 385
Default Re: We weren\'t in the same room

That's awesome! Hopefully, they do this at Empire too.

Adam
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-04-2005, 12:24 PM
flair1239 flair1239 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 343
Default Re: Party Poker over-protecting against collusion?

My gilrefirend has an account at Pokerstars. She called e on my lunch hour and asked if I wanted to play .02/.04 heads up. IT would not let us sit at the same table. I took this as a positive sign.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-04-2005, 12:33 PM
surfdoc surfdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 140
Default Re: We weren\'t in the same room

[ QUOTE ]
The only thing I can figure is that we might have logged on from the same computer at work in the past, and it tracked that.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the problem. I once logged onto my brothers computer 500 miles away and I got the same message when I got home and tried to go play against him. They also refused to lift the restriction.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.