|
|
#11
01-31-2005, 01:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40-80 88 hand
I was ready to fold the turn to a C-r, and at that time i jsut atuo bet the river with an over pair, but in retrospect i think the bet was quite bad,
thanks dave 
|
|
#12
01-31-2005, 01:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 40-80 88 hand
yeah that is why the river bet was so ugly to me, not too many people limp w/ shitty suited kings.
Dave
|
|
#14
01-31-2005, 01:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
results
obviously i lost this one, UTG had 34o for a floped pair and a draw that turned into 2 pair. THe river bet really blew thanks for the responces.
Dave
|
|
#15
01-31-2005, 01:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
[ QUOTE ]
obviously i lost this one, UTG had 34o for a floped pair and a draw that turned into 2 pair. THe river bet really blew thanks for the responces. Dave [/ QUOTE ] 34o eh? The river bet doesn't look so bad anymore...
|
|
#16
01-31-2005, 02:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: results
river bet looks good against a player who limps with 34. you said noone in this game was horrible, i think you need to revise that. if he is an abc player then i think you need to highly consider checking the river. an abc player will have rivered a set of 7s there a good majority of the time. if there was a flush draw out there you could think he may call you with Axs, or possibly rivered A7 for a pair and call you down. that is not the case however, and most players arent going to call the river with Ahigh.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
