Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-28-2005, 07:56 AM
theredpill2 theredpill2 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 15
Default Re: Online Players Anonymous

ONline players are much better than live players. I got the crap kicked out of me at Party Poker. I've lost 1200+ to party poker. I no longer play there. I don't think I will ever go back unless I become a master poker player. Thing about it ? Those thousands of players online are samples from countries all over the globe that are playing. You could be playing Johnny Chan for all you know. You are basically taking the top 5 % of good poker players from UK, top 5 % from Japan etc and throwing them on Party Poker. Now go make some money. Yeah right.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-28-2005, 08:15 AM
luckycharms luckycharms is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 61
Default Re: Online Players Anonymous

[ QUOTE ]


Like... I still haven't adjusted to how I'm supposed to play at TS NL100. They're worse than Party 25. Maybe.

[/ QUOTE ]

YES they are.... and it's easier to remember the giftedly crappy
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-28-2005, 12:08 PM
swolfe swolfe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 632
Default Re: Online Players Anonymous

[ QUOTE ]
40 hours of live play at about 30 hands/hr (which is average) = 1200 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

do you think so? it seemed to me (and maybe i just played at some slow tables), but live hands took about 3-5 minutes each...which means only 12-20 hands/hr.

i don't really like live play. 380 hands/hr is a better pace for me [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-28-2005, 01:38 PM
TrailofTears TrailofTears is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 47
Default Re: Online Players Anonymous

There is a great post recently by fimbulwinter on key elements of playing SSNL. Search for it and read it. Otherwise, just be patient and read and post here on 2+2. You will be able to find leaks in your game and thinking that you might not be able to see without the help of others (and maybe PokerTracker). There are tons of great players on here who are here solely to offer and receive advice on strategy and how to beat the game. Take it to heart and you will vastly improve. Take care and best wishes in whatever you strive to achieve.

- ToT
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-28-2005, 03:59 PM
Jay36489 Jay36489 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 248
Default Re: Online Players Anonymous

30 hands/hr is the standard B&M estimate. Obviously depends on the dealer, the game, and mostly the players. If you have 40hrs at less then that its even smaller a sample size.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-29-2005, 02:50 AM
BobboFitos BobboFitos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: It\'s hot in here
Posts: 551
Default Re: Online Players Anonymous

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
40 hours of live play at about 30 hands/hr (which is average) = 1200 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

do you think so? it seemed to me (and maybe i just played at some slow tables), but live hands took about 3-5 minutes each...which means only 12-20 hands/hr.

i don't really like live play. 380 hands/hr is a better pace for me [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

If you're only playing 12hands/hr, you're not getting your money's worth. At ALL.

Live is painfully slow (for me) but each hand is rarely more than 2 minutes. In fact, I'd wager the norm is 40 to 45 hands/hr.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.