#71
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone bother to check the link of her avatar?
Versus the general public she's pretty good.
Versus all of the pigs that you normally see playing poker, she's a 10. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone bother to check the link of her avatar?
[ QUOTE ]
when she was *ahem* 17 [/ QUOTE ] 17! This just keeps getting better and better. Giggity Giggity! |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jennicide, hot or not?
[ QUOTE ]
I guess I'm in minority here, but I say not. Not ugly either, by any means, but hot? No. Evelyn Ng is hot. [/ QUOTE ] Are you joking? Have you looked closely at Ng's face? If Ng is your benchmark for hotness, then jennicide is definitely hot and then some. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jennicide, hot or not?
No, not joking. Just an opinion. And she is not my benchmark, not even close.
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jennicide, hot or not?
I have a question, how is this a 'rhetorical' question? Are you attempting to point out that the internet is a breeding ground for bizarre and uncomfortable discussions?
Well, I'm game. Jennicide: Nice looking girl and surprisingly patient. In other words, won't last long around here. Can't do the dreadlocks though. Why, Jenni? Just a personal prejudice. Gavin: Didn't know he posted here. Not up on the gossip, I guess. Hey, I'm all for it. NT |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jennicide, hot or not?
Bunch of them at neverwinpoker.com
[image]http://www.neverwinpoker.com/images/jennicide/iheartjamie3[1].jpg[/image] |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jennicide, hot or not?
anyone else see the e-mail she sent to the site:
Bryan (micon), > For the general understanding of how the courts proceed with copyright > law, I will explain. According to Lexis Nexis: > "You do not need to apply or > register to have a copyright; you receive copyright protection when you > create the work...The instant you use your pencil, typewriter or > computer to produce something original it is subject to copyright > protection provided it is a copyrightable subject matter." > Examples of work that already have copyright protection include: > (1) literary works > (2) musical works, including any accompanying words > (3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music > (4) pantomimes and choreographic works > (5) computer databases > (6) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works > (7) motion pictures and other audiovisual works > (8) architectual works > (9) sound recordings > Please forward this information to your attorney. I do believe in > this situation, my "copyright" is witheld in the sixth category. > As stated clearly in copyright law, "Contrary to the wording, however, > whether materials are public has no relationship to whether they fall > into the Public Domain. This mistaken notion has somehow led many to > believe that everything on the Internet is public and therefore in the > Public Domain and thus freely usable without permission. This is > completely false.(1)" > I have clear documentation of copyright law regarding internet > procedure that states: "The URL address is copyright protected. And if > someone uses an image they own as a link to their site, it too is > copyright protected...You will have to have permission to use an image > from a site if you wish to add a link to that site at your own site. > You can add links to any site without permission though, just don't use > their image for the link." For example just putting a link to > http://jenn1c1de.tripod.com is found to be legal, however, posting > images from that URL is found to be illegal. > Nevertheless, whether or not something is "fair use" is rarely a clear > yes or no question. It requires review of case law and the above > factors by an experienced attorney who can assess the level of risk > involved in the proposed use. > After reviewing the material that is provided above, please consider > this as a warning for I am fully prepared to take legal action in this > matter. I am submitting my final and second request to remove > these pictures from http://www.neverwinpoker.com. Please feel > free to have your attorney contact me or my attorney in advance to > court proceedings. If you need my attorney's information, I would > be more than happy to provide it. > Yours truly, > Jennifer Jen, nice job if you actually wrote this. A lot better than the crap many of my fellow law students could produce. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jennicide, hot or not?
[ QUOTE ]
Jen, nice job if you actually wrote this. A lot better than the crap many of my fellow law students could produce. [/ QUOTE ] Nice try. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jennicide, hot or not?
[ QUOTE ]
Nice try. [/ QUOTE ] What is that supposed to mean? |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jennicide, hot or not?
[ QUOTE ]
According to Lexis Nexis: Jen, nice job if you actually wrote this. A lot better than the crap many of my fellow law students could produce. [/ QUOTE ] your fellow law students don't know better than to cite to lexis nexis as legal authority? frightening. /nerd |
|
|