2/4 party empire

[PantherZ]

[ QUOTE ]
But he is also not playing optimally. There are certainly many +EV situations he is passing up.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't disagree.

However, it is very easy to play against a rock, who only plays a few hands and plays them weakly unless he has the nuts.

It is not easy to play against a player who only plays a few hands, yet plays them very aggressively.

[ArthurD]

Table mods like that can be gotten by checking out my site:

http://www.dantonio.info/layout/


Also a few other sites like that, I'll have to link them on my layout site.

[itsmarty]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't consider 11/6/3 to be a rock. 11/3/1 is a rock. 11/6/3 is tight/aggressive.

[/ QUOTE ]

11/6/3 stinks. He needs to play more hands, and raise more as well. Add the fact that he's not topping off his stack, which is $81 at a $3/6 table, and you've got one bad poker player.

There are reasons for not sitting at this table, but 11/6/3 isn't one of them.

Martin

[PantherZ]

[ QUOTE ]
There are reasons for not sitting at this table, but 11/6/3 isn't one of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

How about the 20 VP$IP table average? That was about typical for most tables I saw tonight.

[MicroBob]

Didn't we address this already.

I think this is a VERY beatable table.

Table avg of VP-20 does NOT mean that they are all Ed miller disciples.

[MarkL444]

the difference between now and before is that table selection matters.

[PantherZ]

[ QUOTE ]
Table avg of VP-20 does NOT mean that they are all Ed miller disciples.

[/ QUOTE ]

SSH is a great book, but it doesn't have much applicability to this type of a game. The pots are usually either no flop, or heads up.

[MicroBob]

[ QUOTE ]
SSH is a great book, but it doesn't have much applicability to this type of a game.

[/ QUOTE ]


yes it does.

[toss]

Would you say HPAP and TOP have more use than SSH at these 3.5 to the flop games?

[TylerD]

The Party games do seem a bit tighter recently, that will all change of course when they air the new WPT, WSOP, EPT etc.