Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-12-2005, 10:45 AM
Professor Frink Professor Frink is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 65
Default Re: Ugly 99

I agree that the river bet was wrong and thought i'd get flamed for it when i posted, but still not sure bout the flop.

Is the stop n go the superior play here?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-12-2005, 04:45 PM
molawn2mo molawn2mo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Default Re: Ugly 99

[ QUOTE ]
Man, there is some really questionable advice sprouting up in this thread so far. Someone wants to checkfold this raggedy flop, because a Villian-TAG three-bet preflop?

Someone else said that they like the river bet, even though there is no way a better hand is folding, and the odds of Villian having and calling w/AK seem much worse than the odds of Villian having a better PP. Consequently, I would check and call the river, which will likely cost me a bet if Villian has AA/KK, save me a bet when he probably checks behind with JJ/QQ, and win me an extra bet on the occasional times when Villian has AK and thinks a bet here will push me off of my supposed AK.

[/ QUOTE ]

At the risk of inciting the powers that be...

my analysis discounted the possibility of AA/KK in Villain's range of hands due to Villain's lack of aggressiveness on the flop and turn or to reiterate in the form of a question... WIth AA/KK wouldn't you expect TAG to cap the flop and/or raise the turn. I think yes.

That said... I reduced Villain's range of hands to be JJ/QQ or overs. If so, wouldn't bet/call the river be appropriate?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-12-2005, 04:49 PM
Aces McGee Aces McGee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 509
Default Re: Ugly 99

[ QUOTE ]
That said... I reduced Villain's range of hands to be JJ/QQ or overs. If so, wouldn't bet/call the river be appropriate?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is the villain likely to call with overs?

What hands is he raising the river with (after hero 3 bet the flop and led the turn) that 99 beats?

-McGee
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-12-2005, 05:46 PM
molawn2mo molawn2mo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Default Re: Ugly 99

"Is the villain likely to call with overs?"

He is more likely to call with overs then he is to raise w/JJ or QQ.

"What hands is he raising the river with (after hero 3 bet the flop and led the turn) that 99 beats?"

Unfortunately, I don't know that he is raising the river when I am first to bet. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-12-2005, 06:11 PM
Aces McGee Aces McGee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 509
Default Re: Ugly 99

[ QUOTE ]
He is more likely to call with overs then he is to raise w/JJ or QQ.


[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps. But he's not folding JJ or QQ either.

[ QUOTE ]
Unfortunately, I don't know that he is raising the river when I am first to bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course not. But betting with the intention of calling a raise if it comes is very rarely going to be right here.

-McGee
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-12-2005, 08:40 PM
molawn2mo molawn2mo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Default Re: Ugly 99

What hand will villain hold that raises the river? Other than bluff, there are no river raises, here. That's the point. Betting out the river is for value.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.