Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-08-2005, 02:22 PM
rmr1976 rmr1976 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 14
Default Every 2+2 book on poker is worth reading...

I have to laugh at all these posts that ask for a specific order in which to read all of these 2+2 books.

When it comes to poker, 2+2 books are the best, period. Any poker books by 2+2 are worth reading, in any order.

You have two mathematicians and professional gamblers giving strategy advice, which is entirely different from a typical poker author, who may know how to hustle his totally clueless opponents at the table, but little else.

I have to chuckle at the absolutely ridiculous, clearly false advice that pervates the gambling literature. When a book is published by 2+2, you know that the basic ideas are mathematically sound. Differences arise in the application of the ideas.

Having said that, I'd vote for Miller's Small Stakes Hold 'em first. That will be more directly applicable to online play. Then move on to Feeney's book.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.