Every 2+2 book on poker is worth reading...
I have to laugh at all these posts that ask for a specific order in which to read all of these 2+2 books.
When it comes to poker, 2+2 books are the best, period. Any poker books by 2+2 are worth reading, in any order.
You have two mathematicians and professional gamblers giving strategy advice, which is entirely different from a typical poker author, who may know how to hustle his totally clueless opponents at the table, but little else.
I have to chuckle at the absolutely ridiculous, clearly false advice that pervates the gambling literature. When a book is published by 2+2, you know that the basic ideas are mathematically sound. Differences arise in the application of the ideas.
Having said that, I'd vote for Miller's Small Stakes Hold 'em first. That will be more directly applicable to online play. Then move on to Feeney's book.
|