Is PokerStars Competition Really That Tough?

[MrGrob]

I believe you are correct. I think my biggest issues with BOTH Party and Stars comes from the fact that I am almost always on a shorter roll when I hit those sites, so the downward flux that happenes now and then hurts more.... I plan to hit stars again when I feel comfortable again with both my roll and the site...I just love there software too much to not play at stars. Party...I won't play there as the rake is just too high, and the software still sucks.

And I really don't see how anyone can call UB a tough site. It is a cake walk.

[lefty rosen]

UB if you are tight aggressive it's a total cake walk. The players are way too weak tight...... The fold top pair ace kick to a three bet on the flop and brag about their great laydowns....... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[pyroponic]

How often is TPTK good when the flop is 3-betted?

[lefty rosen]

That question is way too player specific. If the guy is lag about 90 percent good, if it's a rock who is aggressive maybe 60 percent but the rock if he is second has major outs. If it's a passive bird you are dog to godawful [censored]....... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[peter t 9]

i just switched from party to pacific, to give another site a try. these players are even worse no doubt about it much higher flop percentage than party most 1-2 tables have 60% flop percentage much looser than party