Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-14-2004, 07:53 PM
young nut young nut is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 157
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one that folds this pre flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

this hand is an auto-fold for me too, especially in this positon. The rare time that I do play this hand is either on the button (raise for attempted steal) or a complete in the sb. Other than that, this hand is considered junk by me.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-14-2004, 08:29 PM
siccjay siccjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 210
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

Yikes, I guess I'm finding out where my 20 VPIP is comin from. I limp with this normally at loose tables.

People are playing MUCH worse hands than this.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-14-2004, 08:33 PM
tiltaholic tiltaholic is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

hey sic- do you have pokertracker? if so, how're your stats with QJo? just curious. for me it's my #1 loser - that's what finally convinced me that QJo is pretty bad (and seems deceptively good)
-t
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-14-2004, 09:41 PM
PuertoKid PuertoKid is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 97
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

QJo is a trouble hand. I generally fold it. However, if you play this hand I think you're looking for a straight draw or Q + junk.

If you think you are in a top pair fight when a J hits you have to worry about AJ and KJ as many people limp with those hands.

In a top pair fight when a Q falls, you have to worry about KQ. (the other hands that beat you are generally raise preflop).
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-14-2004, 09:48 PM
bigchips bigchips is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 59
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one that folds this pre flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

this hand is an auto-fold for me too, especially in this positon. The rare time that I do play this hand is either on the button (raise for attempted steal) or a complete in the sb. Other than that, this hand is considered junk by me.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you complete as the SB and the BB raises, do you call or fold to 1 bet PF?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-15-2004, 01:51 PM
young nut young nut is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 157
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one that folds this pre flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

this hand is an auto-fold for me too, especially in this positon. The rare time that I do play this hand is either on the button (raise for attempted steal) or a complete in the sb. Other than that, this hand is considered junk by me.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you complete as the SB and the BB raises, do you call or fold to 1 bet PF?

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess this depends on how many people are in the hand. If it is 4 handed or less, I fold for one more bet. 5 or more and I think I'm getting good enough odds on 1sb to make the call, but I would play the hand very carefully.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-15-2004, 03:05 PM
Slick Al Slick Al is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 116
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

Why is QJo an autofold? Per SSH this is playable in late position even going by the tight standards.

Thinking you're going to be up against your kicker+a higher card every time seems very weak tight to me (not directed at k0000k, more at the overall tone here).

QJo is probably a marginal play from CO-1, but that's where I'd start playing it, depending on the table.

Al
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:21 AM
k000k k000k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 109
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

[ QUOTE ]
Thinking you're going to be up against your kicker+a higher card every time seems very weak tight to me (not directed at k0000k, more at the overall tone here).

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe I'm just a tighty, I'm 17% in .5/1. I'm not necessarily scared of being dominated, I just dont like being in awkward positions later on in the hand... When you hit your hand isn't that great, especially in the lower limits where everyone comes along for the ride. There's a lot of overcards, a lot of ways QJo can go wrong.

If I was on the button or CO, I might open raise with it, if the blinds were rocks. I'd rather steal the blinds than see a flop. But then again, when does .5/1 table ever fold to the CO? If I got dealt QJo late, I'd have the 'fold' pre-select button checked before I even find out.

I guess I just think it's more hassle than it's worth.. QJo might be incredibly small +EV, I'm sure it makes your variance a lot higher than your bankroll. Picking a penny out the bottom of your garbage can is +EV too, but why bother?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-16-2004, 10:31 AM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

[ QUOTE ]

If it is 4 handed or less, I fold for one more bet. 5 or more and I think I'm getting good enough odds on 1sb to make the call, but I would play the hand very carefully.


[/ QUOTE ]

this might be ok if you don't trust yourself postflop, but 4 handed, with everyone coming along, you'd be getting 7-1 on the second call - just fyi. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

to those that automuck in: I sometimes play it after a few particularly bad limpers, and I usually muck it even on the button against typical opposition at 1/2, where I'm VP$IP 18. it normally just makes too many expensive second best hands to be messing around with. but against those opponents that will routinely play Q's and J's with worse kickers, and whose raises definitely mean I'm no good, there's no crime in playing it - just don't make it an auto-play.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-16-2004, 12:26 PM
Yads Yads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 412
Default Re: QJo, standard, over or underagressive?

[ QUOTE ]
Why is QJo an autofold?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because Hero is not in CO or Button.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.