|
|
#41
12-11-2004, 09:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Harrington on Volatility
You have your opinion I have mine. I dont think I'm alone in this analysis as Ive read this same subject broached by pros in print/online several times. Its not my agenda to say they ARE or ARE NOT superior too a certain player just that this style will neutralize post flop play too a large degree...and it will.
|
|
#42
12-12-2004, 12:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dan Harrington on Volatility
How does bullying with a big stack negate post-flop play?
|
|
#43
12-12-2004, 12:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dan Harrington on Volatility
do you still really think that greg's style is to often push preflop to negate post flop play. if you do, do you think that because you saw about 20 hands that they showed on the WSOP this year?
you really need to understand how edited those shows are. you really should go back and read greg's old posts, and you'll see that he can play post flop with the best of them. -sossman
|
|
#44
12-12-2004, 03:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dan Harrington on Volatility
[ QUOTE ]
do you still really think that greg's style is to often push preflop to negate post flop play. if you do, do you think that because you saw about 20 hands that they showed on the WSOP this year? you really need to understand how edited those shows are. you really should go back and read greg's old posts, and you'll see that he can play post flop with the best of them. -sossman [/ QUOTE ] What name did he post under? I searched for the obvious ones and nothing came up.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
