Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 12-06-2004, 10:10 PM
Synth Synth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 32
Default Re: GREG RAYMER= OVERATTED ON 2+2??

SilverSurfer,

I too will be finished with this thread as soon as I finish this reply.

[ QUOTE ]
You post frequently on the MTT forum? No, you post obsessively on that forum, and half of it is incendiary drivel like this, littered with dude-speak, shouting matches, and enough grammatical and syntax errors to slay a horde of english teachers. For every intelligent thing you say, there are at LEAST 20 posts that make my eyes bleed

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
5BB HELL NO. That is way too high you will be "Raymer stuck" to call alot of all-ins when you dont have a prayer.

May the Raymer be with you.

Or Sossman he could just read Greg Raymers posts here and becoming a great player who never can fold AQ

I guess Raymer sucking out against someone who had all his chips in with AA is ok especially when the stakes are like 1000x higher right lol.

He's 8x the player Raymer is you can take that too the bank and deposit it...

[/ QUOTE ]

Then elaborate and prove yourself to be right. I was expecting atleast 5 posts in which Zaxx has been all of the above, you only gave me ONE which is not enough to validate your point as far as i'm concerned, especially when there are atleast 20 that make your eyes bleed. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
Zaxx doesn't have Raymer on the brain? These comments are all from the last two weeks alone , but this thread was just for discussion? Right. I'll say it again - he doesn't like the Arieh/Williams bashing, so he decided to start a bashing thread of his own.

[/ QUOTE ]

Absurd.

This thread was not intended to bash Raymer and Zaxx has clearly pointed this out several times. Later on during the thread there are SOME negative posts about Raymer that where out of line and Zaxx was man enough to apologize.

Goodbye.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 12-06-2004, 10:35 PM
silversurfer silversurfer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 95
Default Re: GREG RAYMER= OVERATTED ON 2+2??

I stand by what I posted.

You have your protocol, I have mine. Mine includes spelling somewhat close to properly and not making things painful to read.

It's a free country. If your posts are loaded with spelling errors and that freaking dudespeak/caps lock/incoherent sentences, that's your right. If you wanna make 70 posts a day, I suppose that's your right too - just expect people to not take you seriously most of the time(more cause of the former than the latter).

Hey, I don't think Greg is an all-time great and there is defintely a bias toward him on the forum(I think it's deserved, but anyway). But if you want to openly flame and obsess about a board icon, expect to get in flame wars. We get it already. Stop trying so hard.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 12-06-2004, 11:23 PM
Synth Synth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 32
Default Re: GREG RAYMER= OVERATTED ON 2+2??

[ QUOTE ]
It's a free country. If your posts are loaded with spelling errors and that freaking dudespeak/caps lock/incoherent sentences, that's your right. If you wanna make 70 posts a day, I suppose that's your right too - just expect people to not take you seriously most of the time(more cause of the former than the latter).

[/ QUOTE ]

Spell check sais.....I misspelled 4 words.

Very thoughtful however that you were kind enough to point out that my spelling wasn't 100% accurate, I appreciate it dearly. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] I'm also greatful for the fact that you are smart enough to state the obvious. How can one live without the likes of you. I really don't know how this forum managed to keep going without you. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]


I have been posting on this forum for a long time and no one has ever criticized me for my opinions except for you and that no nothing fool of a poster Busguy.

[ QUOTE ]
But if you want to openly flame and obsess about a board icon, expect to get in flame wars

[/ QUOTE ]

I have never flamed anyone. If I argue with someone it's for the right reasons but i'll never openly flame someone for no reason. I happen to like Greg Raymer, and I appreciate his consistant posting on 2+2. I only replied to this thread to defend Zaxx and Desdia against a CERTIN few that were attacking him.

You're not worth anymore of my time you anathema. I asked you to do something and you FAILED which probably very common.

Good Bye!
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 12-06-2004, 11:35 PM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default I\'m going to assume you are trolling

since you have no idea what you are talking about.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 12-06-2004, 11:39 PM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default we are talking play

why are you so fixated on TOURNAMENTS?
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 12-06-2004, 11:45 PM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default Re: Potato Salad anyone?

I am left to believe people would prefer to either dump on me or avoid the question entirely because it is quite obvious what conclusion would be reached <font color="blue"> in even the most elementary examination of the facts</font>

I guess we'll be looking forward to your release of that report "Potato Salad- the REAL Fossilman" sometime soon?
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 12-06-2004, 11:46 PM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default Actually, I was surprised by the reaction.... a little

Dumbdea is one thing... but, while trollish, the original post wasn't THAT bad....

Some of the following replies, however, needed some work.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 12-06-2004, 11:59 PM
burningyen burningyen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 175
Default Re: To Desdia, the biggest dork on this site

[ QUOTE ]
We wait with baited breath.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah, irony.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 12-07-2004, 12:29 AM
Mat Sklansky Mat  Sklansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 145
Default Re: More content control on the WPT forum needed!

I'm only responding so you can see that I have reviewed your complaint. The posters in question are not, as far as I can tell, in violation of our rules. If I start banning people because there is a small "chance they will offend a great poster", it is my opinion that I would do great damage to the dynamic discussions taking place all over this site. Great posters can take care of themselves quite well.


If you do come across any specific posts, however, please notify me. The easiest way to do so is by clicking the "notify moderator" icon at the bottom of each post.

Mat
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 12-07-2004, 12:49 AM
Desdia72 Desdia72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 676
Default Re: GREG RAYMER= OVERATTED ON 2+2??

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now Raymer's play in the TOC is a different matter entirely. Where did you see "horrid horrid horrid" play at any time? He made some moves and got caught. That sort of thing happens in winner take all tournaments.

[/ QUOTE ]

read your last paragraph again. try raising with dominated hands preflop, then calling over the top all-ins with those same hands because of pot odds.

[/ QUOTE ]

So, by your logic, if Greg raises pre-flop with KK and calls an all-in against AA because of pot odds, it's a "horrid, horrid play".

Got it.

[/ QUOTE ]

you can't be serious.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.