|
|
#21
12-03-2004, 12:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River action against two LP-P\'s
I noticed that in your other thread people commented that they'd call if they had two pair or better in this hand. What about top pair? Suppose we had A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] in this hand instead, with exactly the same action, is it still an easy fold?
|
|
#22
12-03-2004, 12:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: River action against two LP-P\'s
[ QUOTE ]
I think that the problem there is you will check-call in other situations where you are good far more often than 20% [/ QUOTE ] Great point. Important to remember that hands are not played in vacuums. [ QUOTE ] bet-folding is the best line [/ QUOTE ] Without a doubt As I said, I just thought this was an interesting aside for my own curiosity.
|
|
#27
12-03-2004, 12:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: River action against two LP-P\'s
bet-call, because most LAGs will call with a wide enough range of hands that merely trying to induce a bluff will be less profitable. If I had a slightly weaker made hand that check-calling against a LAG might be better.
|
|
#29
12-03-2004, 02:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: River action against two LP-P\'s
Yeah, I'm admitting that in the real situation I wouldn't be able to bring myself to fold for one more bet, though sitting here in front of the screen I don't believe I have the odds. The one other reason for calling is that I don't ever want to make a habit of folding to one extra bet on the river. Even poor players might notice and start taking shots at me! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#30
12-03-2004, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: River action against two LP-P\'s
[ QUOTE ]
I'm admitting that in the real situation I wouldn't be able to bring myself to fold for one more bet, though sitting here in front of the screen I don't believe I have the odds [/ QUOTE ] Okay, cool. Its good taht you can differentiate. I think a lot of people that said they would fold would not have if they were playing the hand.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
