![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't need to put him on a hand with his stack size, just call.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
why is the title "over 2 grand in my stack" when you only have to call a $375 all-in bet in the hand? wow, 2 grand, that's a big chunk of change, congratulations.
if you think that this hand features an interesting or difficult decision in the slightest, i don't think you should be playing this high. i'll assume that you were just trying to brag about your "big stack" and you know that there is absolutely zero worth talking about the play of the hand. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sure your average PP $25NL player would play this the same way, and your average 2/4NL player, and 5/10NL player etc. etc. What makes this hand interesting?
-SmileyEH |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't forget the two outer.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rats...i hope you've learned your lesson and fold to this size raise every time.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Obviously he could be playing AA, KK or AQ or even a flush draw with 2 overs this way, if he has the set so be it you have to pay him off here.
This isn't a particularly sophisticated hand that need analyzing, you are pretty much locked into a call here in a game that aggressive and if you are beat tough crackers. Your stack size doesn't really enter into it once it gets down to just you and the short stack so there's no need to mention it in the title since it didn't really play into how the hand developed. |
![]() |
|
|