Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2004, 09:32 AM
Mr. Graff Mr. Graff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Gone fishing
Posts: 385
Default 44 sb, paired flop

Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed) (read on MP: high VPIP, not very aggressive)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls, <font color="666666">2 folds</font>, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (3 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(3 players)</font>
<font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB folds, MP calls.

Turn: (2.50 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
<font color="CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP calls.

River: (4.50 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="CC3333">MP bets</font>, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 6.50 BB
<font color="green">Main Pot: 6.50 BB, between MP and Hero.</font>

I have to stay in this hand, right? Turn bet is an attempt to prevent him from drawing. (This is also my default play in the sb with a small pp heads up against bb: PFR, bet, bet, check/call - OK?).

I've hit a lot of second best hands today so I find myself questioning plays I would normally view as standard [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2004, 09:35 AM
ALL1N ALL1N is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 156
Default Re: 44 sb, paired flop

Betting the river and folding to a raise seems much better.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-29-2004, 11:32 AM
Mr. Graff Mr. Graff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Gone fishing
Posts: 385
Default Re: 44 sb, paired flop

[ QUOTE ]
Betting the river and folding to a raise seems much better.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just don't see that many hands calling the river that I have beat here, especially considering no PFR = overcards. My thinking is by checking I may induce a bluff.

On the other hand I do think my river play may be too passive in general (river aggression 1.56) and perhaps the above is an example of this.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-29-2004, 07:48 PM
ALL1N ALL1N is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 156
Default Re: 44 sb, paired flop

[ QUOTE ]
I just don't see that many hands calling the river that I have beat here, especially considering no PFR = overcards.

[/ QUOTE ]

How about ace high?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-30-2004, 03:52 PM
Rizen Rizen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: 44 sb, paired flop

I think your line is fine. Depending on the opponent it may be worth a river bet, depending on if you think he'll call with a worse hand or release a better hand. Your ahead often enough here (and your check indicates enough weakness to possibly induce a bluff) to make the call IMO.

I believe The Theory of Poker has an entire section dedicated to heads up play on the river, and the proper action really depends on your read on your opponent. If you think your check will induce a bluff from a worse hand, but he may check better hands behind you, then check/calling is the right play. If you think he may fold a better hand to your river bet or will call with a range of worse hands then I'd come out firing. With no read in a typical 5/10 or 10/20 PP game I probably check/call personally, although some would probably call that weak/tight.

-Rizen
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.