|
|
#11
11-16-2004, 09:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NOT UNDER A DIME, BUT ONE OF THE BEST ON THE MARKET...
Another 1920 x 1200 I was adding to my Xmas list is the Sony PremierPro SDM-P234 reviewed at:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1638335,00.asp Anyone have any experience with that one? I have and love the Dell and hope in a few months to get one of these 23-inchers to try out 6 tables. serling 
|
|
#15
11-16-2004, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Looking for a nice widescreen cinema-like monitor
Bah..still, any under 1k??
|
|
#16
11-17-2004, 05:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Still don\'t understand why not good for 4-tabling.
"Utilizing an Active Matrix TFT LCD, the Dell™ UltraSharp™ 2001FP Flat Panel Monitor displays sharp and brilliant images of text and graphics with a maximum resolution up to <font color="red">1600x1200</font> pixels"
Is the problem the "up to" part? Is the standard resolution lower than 1600x1200? What is the minimum for 4-tabling Party with no overlap?
|
|
#17
11-17-2004, 06:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Still don\'t understand why not good for 4-tabling.
1600x1200 is native. I'm looking at one right now, easily 4 table w/o overlap. will set you back around $600-650, check out your favorite deal sites for deals right now (I got mine over the summer for 670, if i ever make 4-tabling profitable and feel i can handle more i will get another of these, i love it).
|
|
#18
11-17-2004, 08:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NOT UNDER A DIME, BUT ONE OF THE BEST ON THE MARKET...
Yes you can 4 table without overlap. Another post mentions the Sony, that is one to consider too. The HP is the cheapest 23" widescreen I know of currently, though. I got mine off eBay for around $1350.
The extra pixels do help, but I have dual LCDs anyways, and I never go over four tables, so I really would be fine with 1600x1200, but for someone with just one LCD, I would say having the extra 320 pixels helps for misc stuff. - Tony
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
