|
|
#11
11-05-2004, 03:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50-$100 at Foxwoods
[ QUOTE ]
Because he woouldn't fold a pocket pair. I bet the turn because I thought he'd raise Ax or pocket pair. [/ QUOTE ] I'm confused. What did you mean by [ QUOTE ] I wanted to see the turn before I put in another bet. He would fold a pocket pair if the turn was in my favor. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#12
11-05-2004, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $50-$100 at Foxwoods
The reason I didn't 3-bet the flop was because I wanted to see what the turn brought. If it favored me I was betting because I felt he would raise a pocket pair or Ax.
~stephen ps. Now I see the confusion. There's a typo. The would should be wouldn't.
|
|
#15
11-05-2004, 04:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $50-$100 at Foxwoods
If he'd raise a pocket pair or Ax (I somewhat doubt he'd always raise an unimproved Ax on a blank turn here when faced with a stop and go) then what turn card(s) would you consider to be favorable other a 3?
(I think the problem with your line here is that you could very plausibly have a J in your hand, if the flop was 553, I'd like your line a lot more)
|
|
#18
11-05-2004, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Results and comments.
I intentionally left the river play out because I was more concerned about the flop and turn play. Plus the river kinda played itself.
I really don't want my opponent to fold any pocket pair and since he didn't cap preflop it's unlikely he has a pair larger than 9's. The BB only called the turn so that had me a bit confused as to what he held. It occured to me that perhaps he had a Jack and was trapping me for extra bets on the end. I made quads on the river and got multiple bets. ~stephen
|
|
#20
11-06-2004, 12:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $50-$100 at Foxwoods
First, I would 3-bet Arag-suited out of position. There is nothing wrong w/calling your discount.
I think you found and easy c/r on the turn as he's likely to bet his PP again and call down. Jump into the full 20 game. Peace, Joe Tall
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
