![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can't find a link yet but just saw it on the tube.
More damaging news for Bush people. My immediate response is, Duh? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What does a no-bid Pentagon awarded contract have to do with President Bush exactly?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
What does a no-bid Pentagon awarded contract have to do with President Bush exactly? [/ QUOTE ] *coughCHENEYcough* |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cheney is no longer afilliated with Haliburton. Have you read the news lately? Plus this investigation was concluded in Febuary.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clinton gave Halliburton a no bid. Big deal.
The Tracker...... your posts are getting annoying. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Linkage [/ QUOTE ] It's a week before election time so I have to cautious of all news. In time we will see how this pans out. I don't doubt that Halliburton wasn't acting the way it should. If they had been then people should go to jail. Simple as that. But to say Cheney is the reason Halliburton is messing up is a stretch since they aren't connected anymore. Factcheck.org... look it up. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Clinton gave Halliburton a no bid. Big deal. The Tracker...... your posts are getting annoying. [/ QUOTE ] And your responses and excuses are weak. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Linkage [/ QUOTE ] It's a week before election time so I have to cautious of all news. In time we will see how this pans out. I don't doubt that Halliburton wasn't acting the way it should. If they had been then people should go to jail. Simple as that. But to say Cheney is the reason Halliburton is messing up is a stretch since they aren't connected anymore. Factcheck.org... look it up. [/ QUOTE ] You would be cautious of your own shadow if it didn't jive with your view of things. And your avatar is very fitting by the way. How did you hold the camera? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you think that the fact that cheany was once a high ranking halliburton offical and now halliburton gets billion dollar no bid deals is purely coincidence? yikes, theres really no way to respond to that, i assumed it was common sense that would tell you this.
rj |
![]() |
|
|