anyone wanna make a serious shot at the partypoker jackpot?

[cbfair]

[ QUOTE ]
what were her post flop numbers...I bet she had an aggression factor of like .3

[/ QUOTE ]

3.09 w/o pf which makes sense against this table.

[MicroBob]

the idea is to check it down UNLESS we have a JP hand.

why is seat 4 betting the river?

[bforester]

i dont think he's part of the collective

[Alobar]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what were her post flop numbers...I bet she had an aggression factor of like .3

[/ QUOTE ]

3.09 w/o pf which makes sense against this table.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, remember her checking down all kinds of stuff that she should have bet. course I guess she never had the opportunity to just call so that would up her AF

[sthief09]

as far as dividing the money evenly goes, I think it might be best to just leave it as is. there are a lot of really dishonest people out there, and even honest ones can become dishonest when $200k or $100k or whatever it is, is suddenly in their accounts. further, you have no recourse as (1) you can't tell Party, and (2) you don't know the guy's name, address, or anything else. for that reason, I think it's probably best to just let everyone keep it. if 5 players at the table decide to keep the jackpot, and 5 decide to share, this thing is majorly -EV for those who are being honest about it. if you just decided to keep your individual portions, you'd have the same EV as if you decided to split it up.

[NoChance]

I hate folding pocket 5s in the SB!

[MicroBob]

yeah. i had considered most of thief's ideas about this.
obviously the odds that this would actually become an issue are slim but we really should come to some sort of an agreement.


if the 'other' players at the table get $10k or whatever then I think I could live with that.

up to you guys though if you still would prefer to try to split it.



another factor is if party somehow got the neteller records then tehy copuld conceiveably find a way to use that against us as well. keeping the money for ourselves might indeed be the wiser option for a variety of reasons.

[rusty JEDI]

seat 2 has bet several rivers aswell

[bforester]

i've stated that i'd prefer not to split. same ev but longer cycle

[cbfair]

not to mention it significantly reduces the potential for charges of collusion, but doesn't eliminate it.

Not at all.