|
|
#51
10-18-2004, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party is not real poker
Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.
|
|
#52
10-18-2004, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party is not real poker
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 20% too many underdogs win and as you and I play at UB the difference is like night and day. [/ QUOTE ] Can you tell us what kind of hands those 20% underdogs consist of? [/ QUOTE ] Well like when you have QQ and the other guy has AK and you go all in preflop... AK actually wins 65% of the time and QQ wins 35% of the time.
|
|
#53
10-18-2004, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party is not real poker
"Well like when you have QQ and the other guy has AK and you go all in preflop...
AK actually wins 65% of the time and QQ wins 35% of the time. " Almost exactly what I found. AK would get the cheese more like 59% and QQ 41%. The bulk of my research was limited to the bigest mismatches head's up and all in. That group of hands that were on average 80/20 fav/dog expectation ran 75/25 over the sample. 25% winning dogs vs expected 20% yields 20%+ more suckouts.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
