#1
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting theory on SNG
Hi
I don't normally spam this forum about my blog as I don't really talk much about SNGs. Surprisingly, some interesting stuff has been kicked around in the comments of the last few posts; unsurprisingly it wasn't from me [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Feel free to check it out or join in. Dave http://internetpokerpro.blogspot.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interesting theory on SNG
The "doubling up" early chart is interesting. What is the definition of "early" - Levels 1 and 2?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Interesting theory on SNG
Ignore my stuff...its crap [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] The meat of the issue is in the comments. The question started off Paul Phillip-esque....if you get a chance to double up early, say even the first hand, how much of an edge would it need to be? But things progressed quite deeply from there.
gl Dave |
|
|