|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Losing 100BB in under 1000 hands is: | |||
| a regular occurrence. Get used to it. |
   
|
38 | 61.29% |
| an annoying blip. It happens, but not every month. |
  
|
20 | 32.26% |
| a worrying sign that you can't play the game, |
  
|
4 | 6.45% |
| Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
10-09-2004, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who Won the Second Debate?
[ QUOTE ]
so much for fox news being ultra-conservative and biased eh? [/ QUOTE ]Except a few minutes later the commentators claimed the crowd was chanting "Four more years" and "Scary Kerry". Some of the morons I know who watch FoxNews believed it wholeheartedly too, and cited it as evidence that Bush blew Kerry away ... 
|
|
#32
10-09-2004, 06:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Won the Second Debate?
[ QUOTE ]
Bush won. When William Salentan, Josh Marshall, Andrew Sullivan and Kos (all ultra-leftists) call it a draw or Bush win, you know Kerry tanked. Even the mainstream media thinks it was a draw. When MSM says draw, they mean Kerry was crushed. Even, L.A. Times can't even argue for a Kerry win. Look at the Bushies vs. Kerryites. The Bushies are much happier than Kerryites. In light of ABC news picking the questions and Gallup stacking the audience, Bush did well. [/ QUOTE ] Have some more Kool-aid. By the way Andrew Sullivan, is hardly a liberal, he planned on voting for Bush, but decided against it because of his desire for a constiutional amendment prohibiting gay marriage.
|
|
#34
10-09-2004, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
bush & mistakes
For the life of me I cannot fathom why Rove didn't provide Bush with a couple "mistakes" that he could let loose of if that question came up. Something along those lines should have been in the playbook for the prez along with the rest of the canned rhetoric Bush let loose of during the second debate. Perhaps Karl decided that their situation was so fragile that any new openings for the Dems are to be avoided.
Sadly for all of us in the USA, the world was watching Bush display his administration's and the GOP's slavish, blind adherence to a, morally bankrupt, political ideology.
|
|
#35
10-09-2004, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bush being candid
http://www.criticalviewer.com/archives/000057.html
Yep he just tells it like it is during his last press conference.
|
|
#37
10-09-2004, 08:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Won the Second Debate?
I am a libertarian. Not right wing. Have not voted for a major party candidate in a presidential election since 1988.
I convinced three people into voting LP instead of Bush in 2000. Counting my vote, I was responsible for 4 people who otherwise would have voted for W. instead not voting for him. Nice try with the label though. Better luck next time.
|
|
#38
10-09-2004, 08:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Won the Second Debate?
[ QUOTE ]
So...you think Bush won because other people think Bush won? -Diplomat [/ QUOTE ] Absolutely. You think these debates are about the issues? We have heard all this stuff before. It's style, baby. Neither candidate has changed their stance since the first debate, so why the different result? Because their style did change.
|
|
#40
10-09-2004, 08:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who Won the Second Debate?
[ QUOTE ]
People mention the loaded question for Bush on admitting 3 mistakes as being a poor choice by Charlie Gibson, maybe so. I think he had to pick something harsh on Bush to make up for allowing the "Will you look into the camera and pledge not to raise taxes" question for Kerry. There was only one obvious answer to that question, and we know how that worked out for GHWB. Should we just start saying one-term Kerry now? [/ QUOTE ] Huh? That was a great question for Kerry. A tough question would have been to ask for an unqualified pledge. The 200k limitation is pulled straight from Kerry's stump speech. Nice to get a question that meshes precisely with your platform and asks you merely to pledge no more than you have promised on the stump.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
