Annie Duke and the TOC

[blank]

didn't catch that. sorry.

and i don't like hellmuth, i think he's a little baby at the table, and he admits it. i just think he's a much better player than duke.

and again, like i said before, i thought it was a sly/smart play on her behalf.

[blank]

wow. have you ever heard of a guy called Kant and the categorical imperative? hell, have you ever heard of academic discussion? so anyone can just say to anyone, "your obviously stupid and i so dont need to address your arguement." if that was the case, how would anything great ever been accomplished in the history of mankind?

[fnurt]

When you put up the 2 million bucks, you can decide the selection criteria.

[Dominic]

[ QUOTE ]
why am i an ass? if you disagree with my post, tellme why. what points do you think i'm wrong on?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't feel the need to educate you, just tell you that you're an ass. You want to learn something, go back, re-read your original post and ask yourself if you're making any logical sense whatsoever; if you're attacks on Annie's personality and/or poker ability have any merit (especially if they're solely based on TV); or that perhaps you're basing your views on incomplete information.

If you still agree with everything you originally posted, I have nothing else to really say to you.

Except: you're an ass.

[blank]

she deserved to belong there because lederer taught her how to play? so anyone chan or brunson teach automatically deserves to be at the TOC? why am i giving phil too much credit and annie too little? phil has nine, NINE, bracelets and a title. duke just won her first a few months ago. i dont think you could even compare the two.

and like i already said, i dont like phil, i think hes a little baby at the table, but atleast he's paid his dues.

[Dominic]

Yes, I've heard of Kant and the categorical impertaive, and if I thought any of your arguments warranted intelligent discourse, I would engage you in such.

But they don't, so I won't.

Plus, you're still an ass.

[blank]

the only arguements youre bringing forth are personal attacks on me and not my post. you assume i fall into the sterotype and so attack that sterotype yet have failed to address a single sentence in my post. if you disagree with my post, tell me where and why. dont just attack my person, when you don't know the first thing about me or who i am.

[razor]

You know what's great about these forums? When morons like you show up with a couple posts, no credibility and start spewing crap, it only takes a couple clicks and instantly all your posts start looking like this...


[ QUOTE ]
*** You are ignoring this user ***

[/ QUOTE ]


Welcome to the forums.

[maurile]

[ QUOTE ]
if you disagree with my post, tell me where and why.

[/ QUOTE ]
Your post doesn't merit a serious response. That's why you're not getting any.

[MLG]

yeah, and all your post was was a personal attack on annie, so there's a nice symmetry there.