|
View Poll Results: What do you do? | |||
Check | 7 | 30.43% | |
Bet $10 (about half the pot) | 3 | 13.04% | |
Bet $18 (the pot) | 1 | 4.35% | |
Just go all-in ($24) | 11 | 47.83% | |
Other (please specify) | 1 | 4.35% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Choice?
Do we really have are own free will, or are our 'choices' just illusions determined by pre-existing circumstances.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
Get a new name,
stabn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
gotta love philisophical questions that cant be answered
My vote is "both". Its all predetirmed, but I still decided what I wanted when it was time to decide, so it appears like free will to me, which is exactly the same thing. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
[ QUOTE ]
gotta love philisophical questions that cant be answered My vote is "both". Its all predetirmed, but I still decided what I wanted when it was time to decide, so it appears like free will to me, which is exactly the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] But is your 'choice' to choose 'free will' not determined by every single moment that led up to your 'choosing'. I understand your argument for both, but am surprised that given only the two 'choices', you leaned towards free will. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
[ QUOTE ]
But is your 'choice' to choose 'free will' not determined by every single moment that led up to your 'choosing'. [/ QUOTE ] No |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] But is your 'choice' to choose 'free will' not determined by every single moment that led up to your 'choosing'. [/ QUOTE ] No [/ QUOTE ] Than you're saying your 'decision' was random? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
Why you chose free will:
1. You are convinced that you have it. 2. You were posed a question in an internet forum. Why you're convinced that you have it: After considering both possibilities, this seems to be the logical answer. Why this seems to be the logical answer: This is what you have come to believe through experience. Why you were posed a question in an internet forum: Bescause SpearsBritney has nothing better to do with his time than post over-debated philisophical questions. Why SpearsBritney has nothing better to do with his time than post over-debated philisophical questions: Because...you fill in the blank [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
Are you suggesting that my name lacks any sort of credibility or that I'm just a loser?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
The problem with free will (though I believe in it) is reconciling it with the societal compulsion to agree on a universal morality.
My B.A. in Philosophy is worth about 75 cents on a good day. Read Sartre, particularly "Existentialism Is a Humanism," for more on this topic. Also Kant. But Kant was a jackass. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Choice?
Kant's position on free will, the nomenal vs phenomenal duality, with real choice only appearing in the unobservable nomunal 'real' world was little more than a clever peice of wordplay used to evade the logical conclusions that follow from his work on the limits of reason.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|