|
|
#31
01-13-2005, 01:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On another note...
was Teddy going to kill Mike if he had lost? It sure seemed that way to me. Of course, this makes little sense - why wouldn't he just make Mike play poker for him to pay him off. But I always assumed from the way everyone was talking that Mike would be killed if he couldn't pay them.
If that's the case, is there a worse tell in the world than Mike saying, "if I don't call, I won't be able to live with myself tomorrow"? I mean, talking about tomorrow when you will be dead if you lose seems to me a dead give away that you have the nuts. 
|
|
#35
01-13-2005, 10:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What Hand did Teddy KGB have at the end of Rounders
This is definately a copy of Chan/Seidel '88 WSOP. Chan flops the nut straight, with Seidel on top pair with a weak kicker. Chan checks the flop and the blank on the turn sees Seidel move all in. Given KGB puts Mike on a draw the A on the river doesn't faze him. KGB has 10x and is convinced Mike has missed his draw so he feels his 10's are good
|
|
#36
01-13-2005, 11:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What Hand did Teddy KGB have at the end of Rounders
The other hand that Mike could have held that would put him on a draw was also 8-5, not only 4-5. Either way it is not to the nuts but a straight to the 10 is better than a straight to the 8. Just thought I would point that out. If I had to guess I would say A10 for KGB.
|
|
#37
01-14-2005, 01:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What Hand did Teddy KGB have at the end of Rounders
True but they did have others at the table. Heads up I would think Teddy would probably want the money in preflop. Teddy didnt even think about a reraise wich makes me think he didnt have AA even more. [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
|
|
#39
01-15-2005, 01:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What Hand did Teddy KGB have at the end of Rounders
This has been discussed on this board many times. If you go frame-by-frame, you can see KGB has TT.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
