Typical Liberal Tolerance

jaxmike · #1 03-21-2005, 12:07 PM

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash3pg1.htm

Apparently the editor of Playgirl outed herself as a Republican and was fired for it.

cardcounter0 · #2 03-21-2005, 12:38 PM

If it is in Drudge, then it must be true.
[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

jaxmike · #3 03-21-2005, 01:03 PM

your ignorance in ignoring a story because you dont trust the source (when has drudge been wrong?) is telling. forget the FACTS of the story, the source makes it worth ignoring.

cardcounter0 · #4 03-21-2005, 01:15 PM

What is to ignore? The republican party goes out of its way to court religious fundamentalists, and has fired up censorship of the media (recently appointed a conservative christian to head up the FCC). So a liberal publication like Playboy fires a republican? So what? If I ran a meat packing plant, I would probably fire members of PETA too.
[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

jaxmike · #5 03-21-2005, 01:20 PM

wow, your "point" is nonsense. please tell me how exactly it is tolerant to fire someone for how they voted. then, explain to me how this is equal to bush appointing a conservative christian to head up the FCC. you make no sense at all, though its to be expected given your ideology.

cardcounter0 · #6 03-21-2005, 01:30 PM

WOW, wait till the effects of the kool-aid wears off, and then reread my post. The person voted for the anti-playboy party, why should playboy continue to pay them?

Of course, that is ignoring that the Drudge Report isn't actually the most reliable source for facts. So the story might not be true, and if it is, so what? Only your kool-aid induced dementia makes this seem like a 'story' to you.

CORed · #7 03-21-2005, 05:08 PM

I wouldn't call it tolerant, but I think it is perfectly reasonable for a business to fire someone for voting for a party that wants to put them out of business. Another point: We have a secret ballot in this country, so if the editor of playgirl had been smart enough to keep her mouth shut, her emploayer would never have known how whe voted.

xadrez · #8 03-21-2005, 01:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
your ignorance in ignoring a story because you dont trust the source (when has drudge been wrong?) is telling. forget the FACTS of the story, the source makes it worth ignoring.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL
Jaxmike, you routinely dismiss anything cited from supposed "liberal" sources.

Matty · #9 03-21-2005, 04:45 PM

[ QUOTE ]
(when has drudge been wrong?)

[/ QUOTE ]Holy [censored].

AngryCola · #10 03-21-2005, 04:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
The source makes it worth ignoring.

[/ QUOTE ]

Even if the facts are right in this case, the above statement is definitely true.