Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2004, 12:10 PM
DeadWallet DeadWallet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 2
Default Was this a bad Call?

Last night in a 5+.5 SNG on UB,

Its down to 3 people (Im estimating the stacks, but their close), Blinds were ~ 150-300 I think.

UTG: ~1650 Playing solidly, no real reads
SB: ~4200 Has been the big stack most of the tourney, and throwing that weight around.
Hero (BB): ~4150

Im dealt QQ in the BigBlind.

UTG goes All in, SB raises all in, I call.

As it turned out UTG had AT, SB had AK and my hand held up, but Im not sure if my call was a good idea here,

any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2004, 12:44 PM
37offsuit 37offsuit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 172
Default Re: Was this a bad Call?

Well, in a usual situation you're beaten but this is unusual, in that the SB is looking to push you off of marginal hands. The problem is that your hand is not marginal. Putting either the SB or UTG on AK isn't difficult here, or I'd say it is much more common than KK or AA.

Since you have UTG covered, if the SB wins this hand, then you finish second because you had more chips going in. If UTG wins the hand but you finish ahead of the SB, then the SB will be at T50, UTG will have T4950, you will have T5000.

Of course, if your hand holds up you virtually win the whole thing, leaving SB with only T50.

You're either facing a small pair against overcards or two sets of overcards. Ideally you'd be against AK and AK, so that your opponents would only have 4 combined outs against you, and AK, AQ or AX lower than a king cuts those outs as well because of your holding, especially if UTG is the one with the higher kicker.

I call here because it's very likely that you have the best hand going in and also very likely that they are blocking up each other's outs, it is unlikely that they will both get there unless an ace happens to fall. When ever you can get all your money in against a 4 or 6 outer, you should probably take it. When you have so many other ways to improve both in chip count and stack position, I think you should take it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-22-2004, 12:59 PM
Beavis68 Beavis68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 779
Default Re: Was this a bad Call?

Down short handed, I think this was a great play. People put a lot of value on A-x in this situations, and it is very common to see two of the poeple with Aces in there hand, this makes the pair more powerful. Something to consider when you are in this position but have AK instead of QQ.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-22-2004, 07:09 PM
HUSKER'66 HUSKER'66 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth TeXas!
Posts: 954
Default Re: Was this a bad Call?

I like it.

I don't think that the CO would have made a move like that with KK or AA. He would have wanted to raise less to win more...make sense? So maybe medium pockets (9/9,T/T)or A/x suited.

The SB's all in reraise would probably lead me to believe he held something along the lines of A/K, A/Q, or maybe A/J. He thinks that the CO is on a blind steal, and wants to keep you out of the pot.His A/K holding will do much better one on one, and he gobbles up 1650t in chips, giving him a decent lead and some room against you heads up.

Against those holdings your anywhere from a 45% favorite (vs A/K and 9/9) all the way up to 67% (vs A/K and A/K).

Good play IMHO, glad it worked out for you. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Play well,

Husker
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.