![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i mean out of say 15 tables, only like say 4 have pot ave. of or over 66.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
na
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems that generally people would rather play 6 handed at 5/10, one of those strange things. Not to say the games aren't nice and beatable though.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've asked the exact same question before.
5-10 full tables along with 10-20 full tables are overall the tightest tables on party. you can still find good games but overall all the other games are much better. 5-10 6 max is a different story though. you find great action on those tables. blubster |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The pot averages may not be that high, but whenever I've played in them, they have been extremely beatable.
The shorthanded tables, however, are even more beatable... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] scrub |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
they may be tight but they can't play post flop for [censored]. tight does not necessarily mean unbeatable or even tough.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yeah, past lower limits,
the party at party poker (which there always is), is at 5/10 short, 10/20 short, and 15/30 full.. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
is it tough to transition from full to 6 max? i am familiar with the concepts of shorthanded play and have some experience, but I am not nearly as good as at the 10handed tables. If I am considering moving from 3/6 to 5/10 soon... should I consider focusing on the 6max?
|
![]() |
|
|