Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-11-2002, 06:40 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Poker Digest: Top 50 Movers & Shapers



Poker Digest's cover story in their most recent issue is a 9-page article about the most influential people in poker. It is not until half way through the 9th page that this selection is made.


David Sklansky (strategist) with his partner Mason Malmuth


They moderate a newsgroup forum that focuses primarily on game theory and poker strategies, often a level above other usenet sites. David and Mason's long collaboration has produced numerous poker books, now seen in circulation in major bookstores.



However, Mason seems to think otherwise.


This a quote from one of Mason's posts in the Internet Gambling Forum. Although it is taken from the context of a discussion on a specific topic, I believe it can stand alone without losing any of it's meaning. Note: "we" is not specifically clear and I have assumed it means S&M&Z or 2+2 Publishing in general.


Mason Malmuth: I now believe, and this is just my opinion, that we are now the most influential people in all of poker. Since we don't surround ouselves with a lot of hype, not everyone realizes this yet.


So what do we think?


And I thought David and Ray worked for Mason. What's with this "partner" business? [img]/images/smile.gif[/img]



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2002, 09:59 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poker Digest: Top 50 Movers & Shapers



Dynasty,


Here's my list in order:


1) Mason Malmuth--because he responded to the first post I put up on this forum on "AA Cracked" and explained how to properly play them a few years ago when this forum was one forum. Futhermore, he continues to provide examples in his "Hand To Talk About" posts that illustrate the theory in his books. Who else would provide this stuff for free. It's like finding a pot-of-gold.


2) Ray Zee--provides the best one liners that make you think.


3) David Sklansky--asks questions and gives answers, but you have to figure out why his answers are correct.


Enough said.


Good Luck


Mark


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2002, 10:31 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poker Digest: Top 50 Movers & Shapers



If they aren't #1, I can't imagine them being out of the top 3. The availability of their books in major chains and through sites such as Amazon.com have without a doubt had significant impact on the broadening of the base of poker players. Every major "name" in poker has read their books.


Bringing knowlege to the masses for absurdly cheap prices is, I think, the most important thing to happen to poker. Ever.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2002, 10:51 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default \"the most important thing to happen to poker\"



that would be paradise poker (and its imitators).


it's always a contest each month to decide which rag is least worthy to wipe my ass with: poker digest or card player.



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2002, 11:14 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default \"shapers?\"



HEY- PokerBabe(aka) has the best "shaper" in poker, IMO. Why is she not on the list?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2002, 03:43 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default diamond in the rough



perhaps they didn't read these forums well enough when they were making the list. you're on my list of top 2+2 posters.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2002, 04:16 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Poker Digest: Top 50 Movers & Shapers



First, I wrote the above about us before I saw the Poker Digest artice.


One of the problems that we at Two Plus Two have in this world of poker is that many of the people involved with these magazines and writing the articles are in my opinion extremely unknowledgeable. A good example is a previous article by the same author where she was discussing recent developments in poker. She was aware of the Internet but was completely unaware of this site even though she mentioned RGP. Now I can't prove it, but I believe that we have more traffic than RGP, and certainly the quality of serious poker discussion is better.


But the bottom line is the books. We now have 26 titles in our family and this includes not only how to play very well, but a book for total beginners, a book for dealers, and much information on how cardrooms should be run. I don't believe that there is any aspect of poker that we haven't influenced, and I also strongly believe that we have done this in a very positive way.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2002, 04:23 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: \"shapers?\"



As I stated below, the writers and management affiliated with many of these gambling magazines are just not very knowledgeable of what is happening in Two Plus Two land. If they were, you, PokerBabe, would have certainly been on the list.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-12-2002, 09:41 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default MASON: ARE YOU A MILLIONAIRE ? *NM*




Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-12-2002, 10:04 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: MASON: ARE YOU A MILLIONAIRE ?



he is now. when i first met him he wasnt, but thru my get direction he has become quite wealthy. he will never catch up with me though even though he has demoted me to his assitant.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.