Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2002, 03:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Three Hands with two maniacs.



I need some serious help here and was hoping for some perspective. I was a the Taj saturday, playing a $5-$10 game with one maniac. All was well and good, and it became very easy to write off his three-bets and caps as weak draws, or middle pair, no kicker.


Anyhow, I am about even when maniac number two enters. Manac number two is drinking heavily, loving life, and bets everything. I am not kidding, he will bet/raise at almost any oppurtunity. Laughs loudly, and raises all the way through without looking at his cards exclaiming "Why should I look at im', I play them all the same way" as he bets, raises, re-raises, caps. I of course, as well as others, am stuck between two maniacs. The two maniacs obviously don't get along, and proceed to cap almost everything(Although the second maniac will sometimes behave if you check-raise him.)


Hand 1: Red Queens, Capped pre-flop..Felt good cause I made it two bets, new maniac three-bet without looking at his cards, and I capped it. The whole table is on tilt now and seven take the flop for 14 big bets in the pot.


Flop T82 rainbow. I see the T8 and I am very worried...I figure I will check-raise to try and limit the field. Checked to old maniac who bets. Two two people call, i check-raise, new maniac three bets, old maniac caps. Five people stay in for another 10 big bets, bringing us up to 24 big bets in the pot. I check and call it down with the old maniac betting and new maniac just calling(I was amazed). Four people stayed, two rags hit, Old Maniac drags the pot with a set of twos (32 big bet pot, cost me 6)


Second Hand : A couple of hands later I am in the big blind with K2 suited. By the time it gets to me its two-bets(one more) with eight people...Normally I wouldn't play King Trash suited, but I figured I had the odds with eight callers(was trying to think on my tows to adjust to the game). I call(praying it will only cost me one bet, but knowing I am looking at another cap), and long story short I end up losing my flush to the original(non-drunk) maniac who has A4s.


Third hand is a pretty typical straight getting rivered by a full house.


Anyhow, it took all of 40 minutes to drop over three bills(about 35 big bets). In retrospect, I think I should have done alot differently. Here are my questions.


1)Should I have even been there. As this was going on I was thinking to myself "This is awesome" I got one who frequently three-bets the ignorant end of a straight with four parts on the board, and someone capping it who hasn't even looked at his cards yet. But it all went so very very wrong. I am thinking that the best move would have been to take a walk.


2)Any comment on the pocket Queens would be greatly appreciated. I felt obligated to get bets in to try and protect my hand, but maybe I should have realized that no one was going anywhere.


3)If I do decide to stay in these games, how should I adjust my starting hand requirements. I realize I am going to have to flop a monster to feel comfortable, but what hands are worth staying in with when you know it will be capped pre-flop? Huge pairs even seem sketchy, since you will likely need a set, or the board to pair low to win(and even then in this game you would likely be against trips).Even thouhg I got burned with Kxs, flushes in this game were rarely higher than a Jack.


4)Can these games be profitable? I had good reads on most of the people at the table, and knew I had the best hand preflop, but flopping top pair, ace kicker with AK, AQ, AJ seemed very unprofitable. I lost another hundred very quickly with these "premeium" hands


Any comments would be greatly appreciated. I generally consider myself a solid player, but when things get out of hand like this, I always end up losing a ton of money. One of the guys at my table used to live in CA, and said the game reminded him of the $8-$16 HE he played at home.


Thanks,

-J
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2002, 03:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Three Hands with two maniacs.



Looks like the whole table was turning into maniacs. Anyway, the idea is to try to isolate a maniac, but in this case it seems impossible. Read HPFAP pg.130 on the subject to get some ideas on where to sit, what hands to play, etc. If that doesn't work, find a new game. Good Luck--Ron
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2002, 04:38 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Three Hands with two maniacs.



Maniac games take some getting used to. I would tell you that Axs, large suited connectors, and pairs do well. Big unsuited cards do not. I usually muck AKo in these games, unless for some odd reason the game calmed down for a round or two. If you're going to dump a rack of chips in by the river, you want to have at least a set. These games are generally won on straights or better. Too much chasing. Kxs, as you learned, is the hand you want the manaic chasing with.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2002, 07:32 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Just another day...



That's standard issue 3-6 and sometimes 6-12 in NorCal. Sometimes standard issue 15-30 on weekends.


Pocket pairs, suited aces, big suited connectors. That's about it for me in those games, but be ready to lose big even if it gets capped around you when you have AA or AKs. You're gambling with the best of it, but you're still gambling...


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2002, 08:42 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Three Hands with two maniacs.



JimC, I played $5./10 Friday night at boat Aztar in Evansville, IN. It was a must-move table. We had a maniac there that was drinking and having a great time. He was a friendly maniac and had all of us laughing, and he was throwing chips to the cocktail waitresses and dealers like they were going out of style.


This guy never looked at his cards either until after the flop. He either raised, reraised or capped. I was across the table from him at this first table. About two hours into a four-hour session, I had to move; but I knew he would be right behind me because he was next in line to move. Sure enough, in about 15 minutes he was setting at my table and immediately on my left. I told everyone to fasten their seat belts because we were in for a bumpy ride. I simply didnt see the flop if my holdings wouldnt stand a raise. I didnt play many hands because my cards were lousy. Up front I played only Group 1 and 2 hands. As our position improved, I would play all pairs and suited connectors down to about 65 if there were 5 callers in front of me. I got to hell out after the flop if I didnt have a made hand or one hell of a good draw to a non-threatening board.


I ended up 2.5 BB per hour ahead at the end of the session. If I hadnt used extraordinary patience and discipline, I wouldnt have been so fortunate.


Man, it was fun though [img]/images/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/smile.gif[/img]


Don Quixote
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2002, 10:06 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Three Hands with two maniacs.



the QQ hand i wouldve waited for the turn to knock players out. the pots way too big.


the Kxs hand i wouldnt have seen the flop. you have 2 maniacs. would you see this flop for 2 bets coming to you? with 2 maniacs you can figure it being raised behind you. it doesnt look like you considered this...


offsuit hands suck in these games. AJo, AQo..forget em. also understand where youll be able to 'protect' your hand, and where youll be pot building. protecting is not on the flop. if you flop a monster, bet it, but use the turn a little, to knock some players out. noones going anywhere on the flop in these games.


these games are profitable, but your swings will be huge. as you experienced. and the more hands you play, the bigger your variance.


i personally hate these games because of the variance factor. i tend to get a table change soon. i dont play cap preflops type of tables. if i did, and had the roll to beat it, id move up to where that cap is the initial blind. BUT some really dig these games...theyll probably be more help...


jsut some ideas...


b
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-25-2002, 10:41 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Three Hands with two maniacs.



Actually, later on the game went short handed(6 players) and only the drunk maniac was playing. I won about a hundred dollars in thirty minutes off this guy. Basically, if it was folded around to me preflop I would raise with any Ace or King to try to get it heads up with him. Any Ace or King high was often good. I get the impression that this guy had a lot of money and looked at the game like craps or blackjack... I will say this, I have never had so much fun losing so much money.


Thanks,

-J


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-26-2002, 09:58 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Three Hands with two maniacs.



Mucking AKo offsuit in this game is a major mistake. Check out this link:



Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-26-2002, 10:02 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Some comments



Although AKo goes down in value with a maniac in the game, if he is the only one doing the raising, you should not be dropping AKo. The game conditions would have to include capped betting for a lot of players preflop in order to consider this fold. Or, if a rock who never raises does something like three-bet the maniac. If you can reduce the field, you should be raising AK, not folding it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-26-2002, 12:08 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Three Hands with two maniacs.



I agree with Bernie's advice.


I used to get in one of these games and think "This is great. With a table playing like maniacs I should be able to make some money." I'd play as others had recommended as well (mainly pairs, suited connectors, suited big cards, suited aces -- get out if the flop misses you). Sometimes I'd come out ahead, and sometimes I'd lose a LOT. However, for me, the variance is just too high.


In a normal loose-passive game I will make my one BB per hour. After weeks of this I don't want to risk losing everything I've worked for in one session. Granted I could double a months worth of winnings in that session as well, but I'd prefer to find another game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.