Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2004, 08:46 AM
cjs cjs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bloomington,NY
Posts: 116
Default trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

party 25 NL - would like comments on how to play this hand.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (10 handed) converter

MP1 ($19.15)
MP2 ($12.50)
Hero ($95.83)
CO ($22.35)
Button ($22.50)
SB ($20.40)
BB ($15.05)
UTG ($35.55)
UTG+1 ($29.10)
UTG+2 ($69.40)

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG folds, UTG+1 folds, UTG+2 calls $0.50, MP1 calls $0.50, MP2 folds, <font color="CC3333">Hero raises to $2.75</font>, CO folds, Button folds, SB folds, BB folds, UTG+2 calls $2.25, MP1 folds.

Flop: ($6.75) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players) </font>
UTG+2 checks, <font color="CC3333">Hero bets $93.08 (All-In)</font>, UTG+2 calls $66.65 (All-In).

Turn: ($166.48) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players, 2 all-in) </font>

River: ($166.48) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players, 2 all-in) </font>

Final Pot: $166.48
<font color="#990066">Main Pot: $140.05, between Hero and UTG+2.</font> &gt; <font color="white">Pot won by UTG+2 ($140.05).</font>
<font color="#990066">Pot 2: $26.43, overbet by Hero.</font>

Results in white below: <font color="white">
UTG+2 shows Kc Kh (three of a kind, kings).
Hero shows Tc As (two pair, aces and tens).
Outcome: UTG+2 wins $140.05. Hero wins $26.43. </font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2004, 08:49 AM
gavrilo gavrilo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 442
Default Re: trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

Uh...
I usually fold this preflop and the flop all-in is a tad extreme.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2004, 08:57 AM
cjs cjs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bloomington,NY
Posts: 116
Default Re: trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

thought I was aliittle over the top - still learning. But had been running over the table before that with alot of raises, stealing blinds, etc. Is the nl game just a game of who has the nuts? Or does aggression win?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-19-2004, 10:11 AM
samjjones samjjones is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 21
Default Re: trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

Measured aggression is fine. Problem is what happens when you run into a monster...as you did here. You have to leave yourself the opportunity to get away from a hand, and the all-in was not a good move at that point in the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2004, 10:39 AM
Loci Loci is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 58
Default Re: trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

No limit is a game of patience. While good cards help, you don't always need them; you need to know, however, when blank cards are enough to win. Don't make moves if they're not going to work... this is best found through a lot of trial and error with honing your gut feeling. When you get to be better, there will be moves that you can make to get the second nut to fold. There will also be times when you, with second nut, realize you should fold. Aggression is a key aspect of this game, but unless you're Daniel Negreanu or Scotty Nguyen, learning to be patient is far more important. I rarely bluff... that being said, in a twelve hour period, with players that expect me to play tight and know I'm only pushing all in with the nuts, I will make three or four steals on monster pots that my opponents usually feel they'd be throwing their money away to see my cards face up. This, obviously, isn't everyones style. When I have cards, I make them pay every cent to see them through aggressive raises or tricks like check raises/smooth calls. When you have a winner, just be smart enough to get everyone elses money in the pot. If you have a loser and sense they're also weak, bet a solid amount that will scare them as opposed to the transparent all in move... as the saying goes, it works everytime but once.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2004, 11:01 AM
Sundevils21 Sundevils21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 111
Default Re: trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

I would make a note on UTG+2, that says he is capable of limping in EP with KK. Notes like this can help out a lot down the road.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2004, 11:22 AM
Prevaricator Prevaricator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 231
Default Re: trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

The only real way you are going to get called with a bet like that on the flop is if they have QJ, AK, or a set (hands that can beat yours). I don't like that play.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2004, 12:09 PM
turnipmonster turnipmonster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 511
Default Re: trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

[ QUOTE ]
Is the nl game just a game of who has the nuts? Or does aggression win?

[/ QUOTE ]

your problem in this hand is you don't know whether you're bluffing, value betting or semibluffing.

when you make a huge bet that will only get called if you are beat, that is a bluff. when you are bluffing, your cards don't matter. you could have 72o. check out "tournament poker for advanced players" where he talks about unwittingly turning your hand in 72o.

when you are value betting, your aim is to get called by a hand you can beat. so the first question to ask yourself in no limit before you bet (and if you aren't bluffing) is always "if I get called, what is he going to call me with?"

semibluffing in no limit is pretty tricky, the most common form being raising allin on the flop with a flush draw. this way there is a good chance your opponent folds, but if you get called you have a 2 to 1 shot to hit your hand.

also, two general observations about aggression. be aggressive in position. you shouldn't be playing many pots out of position period, but you are going to get yourself into some really bad situations by being aggressive out of position. also, as in any game, the more information you have about your opponent and his possible holdings, the easier it is to be aggressive and apply pressure to make him fold. blind aggression against unfamiliar opponents is a recipe for losing a lot of chips.

--turnipmonster
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2004, 12:52 PM
Don_Lapre Don_Lapre is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 14
Default Re: trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

I'm not sure I'd raise with A-10, it's not a terrible play but I'd be more inclined to fold because it's a tricky hand. If you get called you kicker might be worthless. In the hand you posted a better course of action might be to make a pot size bet on the flop, maybe $4-5 dollars and see what happens. If your opponent played back it you and you be facing a tough decison that would depend on your read of his play before the hand. If your opponent just called I would be concerned with the possibilty of QJ, but probably put him on a flush draw, AQ, or AJ. Still a tough hand regardless.

DL
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-19-2004, 01:49 PM
Richie Rich Richie Rich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 222
Default Re: trying NL for the first time - how bad was this hand

Several mistakes...

(1) raising PF with A10o. This is NOT typically a raising hand in NL.
(2) nice flop, you caught two pair. But why go all-in for such a small pot?

Hands that beat you on the flop are...AA/KK/TT/AK/QJ. Granted UTG+2's PF limp and flop check with KK is from out of the blue...but maybe he was setting this move because you were being extremely OVER-aggressive on many other hands. You can do this for a while, but sooner or later, someone is gonna trap you...nature of the game.

btw- you built your stack up nicely before this hand [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.