Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2004, 10:48 AM
sweetjazz sweetjazz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 95
Default What did they have? (low content)

It's a 7-handed home game, for very low stakes. Unfortunately I don't remember the exact betting before the turn, but I think it was just limped around before the flop and played pretty passively on the flop.

The flop was 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. Turn comes 9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. It quickly gets heads up between two pretty aggressive players. They go for 7 or 8 bets here.

River comes the 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. Out of position checks, in position bets, out of position calls.

Results in white:
<font color="white">Out of position has 97o for the rivered full house.
In position has T9o.</font>

WTF?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2004, 12:22 PM
deacsoft deacsoft is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 205
Default Re: What did they have? (low content)

If I was going to play one of those hands (which I wouldn't unless the circumstances were right) I would probably play very similar to how they played it. My question though is this... Do you not play with a cap at all or do you let them go as much as they want when it is heads up?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2004, 05:06 PM
sweetjazz sweetjazz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 95
Default Re: What did they have? (low content)

There's no limit to the betting when it's heads up. (Capped after 4 bets in a round otherwise.) But after the third or fourth reraise, you know where the other 9 is (unless the other has 33 or QQ). And neither kicker was very good -- there was a good chance both of them were drawing to split the pot or had lost by that point. And then the 97 didn't even realize the river 7 had filled him up, which is why he didn't bet the river (he explained afterwards).

The game is as if kickers didn't exist at all. Not that I am complaining at all. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2004, 05:23 PM
bmedwar bmedwar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Posts: 71
Default Re: What did they have? (low content)

Normally the rule is that the betting round has to start with only two players. So the cap would have effect on the turn, but not the river.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-26-2004, 05:42 PM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: What did they have? (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
Normally the rule is that the betting round has to start with only two players.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've never seen this restriction on the "heads-up no cap" rule. It usually just has to be heads up when the 4th bet goes in (or maybe when the 5th bet can be put in).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-26-2004, 05:45 PM
thrillhouse thrillhouse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
Default Re: What did they have? (low content)

[ QUOTE ]
WTF?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you answered your own question:
[ QUOTE ]
It's a 7-handed home game, for very low stakes.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.