Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-02-2004, 06:43 PM
AeonBlues AeonBlues is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 203
Default WTO rules on internet gambling

The World Trade Organization has rulled that US bans on internet gambling are a violation of free trade practices.

Please refer to http://asia.news.yahoo.com/040325/af...7hightech.html

for more information.

AeonBlues
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2004, 06:43 PM
M.B.E. M.B.E. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,552
Default Re: WTO rules on internet gambling

There's a good (short) analysis of the decision at the web site of the law firm Coudert Brothers:

http://coudert.com/news/client_advis...t_gambling.pdf

(note this link is to a pdf document).

Since the actual decision of the WTO dispute panel has not yet been publicly released, the analysis is based primarily on the legal arguments submitted to the panel by the parties.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-04-2004, 01:18 AM
StevieG StevieG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Posts: 157
Default Re: WTO rules on internet gambling

Thanks for the link, that was informative.

One thing in particular strikes me. The analysis notes that the U.S. may be able to restrict gaming services in particular because part of the trade agreement stipulates:

Member governments shall not be prevented from adopting and enforcing certain specific kinds of regulations, such as measures “necessary to protect public morals or to maintain public order” or measures “necessary to secure compliance with laws or regulations”, provided that such measures are neither “arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination” nor “a disguised restriction on trade in services”.

The thing I find interesting is that these these measures are not arbitrary or a disguised restriction.

Is it arguable that services online are no different from the ones allowed in some form in so many states, and therefore the US position is a disguised restriction?

Within the U.S., Indian gaming took a similar tact - if state law allowed some form of gaming, they argued the state could not restrict the reservation from doing the same.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.