Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2002, 12:34 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default bad check raise



I was in early position in a 6/12 game this week.


I held KK from early position and raised preflop. two callers one from late position. The flop hit k69 rainbow. I checked the lp bet bb called and I called. The turn was 6 giving me the nut full house. I checked lp bet the bb folded. I raised the lp folded in disgust. I think this was a huge mistake for me to have check raised with a player (after thinking about it later) is known to fold fairly easily. I think i should have bet out. I believe he would have called in the hope of making his full house or trips on the river. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2002, 12:49 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Maybe LP was trying to steal



If so, LP would have probably folded to your bet.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2002, 02:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: bad check raise



Play your monsters the way you did (you won't get many of them), but play the same way with other hands. Either he'll learn not to fold when you check raise him on the turn, or you'll win a lot of money off of bluffs/semi-bluffs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2002, 02:43 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: bad check raise



Why didn't you check call the turn, ESPECIALLY since the player folds easily, and then decide whether to bet or check-raise the river?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-23-2002, 06:06 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default You should also have bet the flop



You should bet the flop, check-call the turn, and bet the river. If you didn't make a full-house on the turn, then you should have probably check-raised.


You're opponents are expecing you to bet the flop. Why would you check?



Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-23-2002, 06:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: You should also have bet the flop



This is a good point. Not betting the flop is very suspicious when you raised pre-flop. LP should have checked behind you.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-23-2002, 07:16 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: You should also have bet the flop



"You're opponents are expecing you to bet the flop. Why would you check?"


Very true, which is also why many (good) players will raise this flop often with any pair to see where they stand, semi-bluff/buy a free card with a draw etc etc.


To put is simple, play this hand straight-forward 90% of the time. Mix up if you have a VERY good reason to believe this will pay off. You will get be surprised to see the action you will sometimes get even with this monster. In some games it's harder to get the action you want in pots like these, but those games are often just as good or even better for other reasons (passiveness being one).


lars
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-23-2002, 07:32 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is checking the flop so bad?



Regarding the flop play:


I can see that more astute players may fear you are planning to check-raise and would check behind you. But it also seems to me that with less sophisticated players, a check on the flop is more likely to induce a bet from a middle or bottom pair or someone might even try to bluff, hoping you have something like AQ/QQ/JJ and will fold.


Whereas if you bet out, those same players may well fold figuring you for AA/AK/KK and you win nothing on the hand.


What am I missing?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-23-2002, 07:33 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Oh, and a few other things...



1) If you decide to check-raise, which you should do in situations where you feel fairly certain that you are playing players which this will work against (ie you even get paid off), this is a fine opportunity to sometimes wait for this check-raise until the river, particularly against tough opponents who bets the river often. Many players will rarely or never check-raise the river, particularly if the river doesn't bring a flush card or a card which completes a possible open-ended straight. It is tough to check-raise the river, here is a good situation for you to tell your opponents that they can't bet the river in the safe knowledge that it's not going to cost more sometimes.


2) Regarding your check-raise on the turn, this is a far better move if you are sometimes able to check-raise 'semi-marginal' hands like AK on a K-T-5-2 board. This will make you a more frequent check-raiser on the turn and people will be more enticed to see what you could be holding all those times (after all, most LL players only check-raise big, big hands, and you can't be getting twice as many of those as the rest, now can you?;-).


lars
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-23-2002, 11:34 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is checking the flop so bad?



Here's my take on this situation: comments welcome.


The general principle is that weak players overuse the slow-play. In this case, a very common reason someone follows a pre-flop raise with a check on the flop in LL tends to be because the pre-flop raiser caught the flop in a big way and is slow-playing.


Consequently, most LL players will expect YOU to slowplay hands like top sets and made straights. So when you bet out on the flop, they automatically assume you don't have this hand and will pay you off and even raise you with hands like top pair, top kicker.


In this case, maybe some players might put you on QQ and bet into you, but in general following a pre-flop raise with a check on the flop looks suspicious because most players will read it as a slow-play.


So in short, betting out on the flop will generally build bigger pots and disguise your hand better.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.