Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-27-2004, 03:11 AM
CrisBrown CrisBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,493
Default \"Oh no ... not him/her again....\"

Hi All,

I tossed this out in one of the 2+2 SNGs last week, and someone said I should start it as a thread. So ... who are the players you LEAST like to see at your table? The ones where you think "Oh no ... not him/her again...."

For me, the list includes VVictor, Riverloser, TheBeat, gank, and bparis, all excellent players on PokerStars. I'm not sure, but I think Riverloser was the TLB champion last year, and I know TheBeat and gank are high on the TLB list every month. VVictor and bparis always give me fits, and I worry anytime I'm in a pot with them because I know I need a really BIG hand to beat them.

I try not to play intimidated with them, but all of them are players I'd rather avoid unless I'm on a monster. So that's my list.

Who's on yours?

Cris
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-27-2004, 02:19 PM
jwp jwp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 70
Default Re: \"Oh no ... not him/her again....\"

I'm still too small potatoes to have a specific list. At SNG's from 5+1 to 20+1, I haven't found anyone that stuck in my memory or was scary enough to write down.

So, I guess my list contains all of the people I play against in the 2+2 SNGs!

JWP
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2004, 02:57 PM
DrPhysic DrPhysic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 838
Default Re: \"Oh no ... not him/her again....\"

Especially William, Heyrocker, and JWP

Doc

(Cris, too)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2004, 07:00 PM
M.B.E. M.B.E. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,552
Default Re: \"Oh no ... not him/her again....\"

Hmmm, looks like you're playing right now with a lot of tough players in tourney 1081615 -- Gank, Legato, Slime51, Spy238, (well, he's eliminated now).

Some lively chat at Cris's table too!

Right now Cris is 4th out of 15 remaining.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-27-2004, 08:04 PM
CrisBrown CrisBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,493
Default Re: \"Oh no ... not him/her again....\"

Hiya M.B.E.

Yes, that was a tough table. I survived to 2nd place ... and I do mean survived. spkplr literally ran us over in the final five, catching pocket pairs hand after hand and pushing us out of every pot. Given the way it played out, I'm thrilled with 2nd place money.

Cris
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-27-2004, 08:20 PM
M.B.E. M.B.E. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,552
Default Re: \"Oh no ... not him/her again....\"

Congratulations. Always nice to make $865 for a couple of hours' work.

I didn't see the whole thing, just bits and pieces. It was pretty funny when an observer offered to sell a WSOP package for $7K, which Legato agreed to, and Slime51 offered $8K just so Legato wouldn't get it.

When I looked back a few minutes later, however, Slime51 and Legato were both gone; it was down to three-handed with, as you said, spkplr having a huge lead. Something like T24K of the T27K in play.

By the way, Legato used to post on 2+2 a fair bit, but haven't seen him around here lately.

I think I know who Gank is and if I'm right, he used to be a frequent poster on the Mid- and High-Stakes holdem forum. He still does post on 2+2, though under a different name and not as much. (And not on the tournaments forums.)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2004, 08:49 PM
CrisBrown CrisBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,493
Default Re: \"Oh no ... not him/her again....\"

Hiya M.B.E.,

[ QUOTE ]
Congratulations. Always nice to make $865 for a couple of hours' work.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you. It was. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

On a hunch, I decided to look at my PokerTracker stats for $215 and $109 SNGs vs. lower buy-ins. The sample size is, of course, infinitessimal. But I think I play better, more patient poker at the higher buy-ins. After all, with $109 or $215 put out on the table, and considering how difficult it is to get one of those up and running, they're nowhere near as fungible as the low buy-ins. So I play to survive more, and I think that tells me a lot about the mistakes I make at the lower buy-ins. *shrugs*

Cris
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.