Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-2004, 11:07 AM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again

One bright spot from yesterday's otherwise crappy pokering.

I'm dealt Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]T [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and open raise from MP. All fold to the button who 3-bets. Blinds fold, and I call.

Flop: A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Not a bad flop.

I bet out and get raised. I 3bet and he calls.

Turn: T [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

I bet, he raises. Well looks like he has a Q too, good thing I'm free-rolling with the nut-flush draw and I happily 3-bet which puts him all-in.

River: J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Bingo!

And I didn't even get a nh from the table, wtf? Guess you only get those when you win with 92o.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-2004, 12:33 PM
RickA RickA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 52
Default Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again

Nottom

vnh

Since I figure you will enjoy talking about this hand for a while, I have a question. Why did you open raise? Is this not a hand that plays better multi way?

Thanks
RickA
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-10-2004, 12:37 PM
josie_wales josie_wales is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 458
Default Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again

Nottom,
I too was wondering about that open raise?

Are you trying to force out some of the lesser Ax's and Kx's?

JW
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-10-2004, 12:37 PM
chrisgs chrisgs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 39
Default Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again

VNH

Did he have a Q(I would hope so)?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-2004, 12:37 PM
josie_wales josie_wales is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 458
Default Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again

And oh yeah....

'nh'

[img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

jw
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-2004, 12:47 PM
GuyOnTilt GuyOnTilt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again

I too was wondering about that open raise?

If you never open-limped in MP, you wouldn't be making a mistake. His raise is fine as long as the players on his left aren't tough and he himself hasn't been raising liberally. In some cases, it may be a fold.

GoT
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-10-2004, 01:14 PM
spamuell spamuell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 924
Default Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again

If you never open-limped in MP, you wouldn't be making a mistake.

What about on a loose passive table in MP with 5 players to act behind you (MP3, CO, button, blinds) with 77? what about 87s? 55?

Would you open raise these?

You're surely losing a lot from folding them, and you want others in the pot with you with them, and good implied odds. Surely open limping is the only way to go - you're likely to be called in several spots.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-10-2004, 01:51 PM
slogger slogger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 168
Default spamuell, are you sure about that?

"...77? what about 87s? 55?...

"You're surely losing <font color="blue"> a lot </font> from folding them"

I don't know that you're losing much, if anything. I'd certainly open raise w/ the 77 in that spot, and though I might open-limp w/ 55 (EMP fold, MP limp, LP raise), I don't think I'd lose much by folding it in MP. As for 87s, you're certainly not losing anything by folding it in MP, rather than open-limping. As you said, it's a drawing hand that likes cheap-entry multi-way pots, so it's not worth playing up front or in MP when you have no reason to expect muti-way action. Not to mention the fact that an open limp from MP or LMP is practically begging for a raise from the CO, button or blinds.

It would have to be a ridiculously loose passive game for me to open limp 87s in MP.

I'd like to hear your thoughts on why I might be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-10-2004, 02:27 PM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again

I would raise 77, and usually fold the others.

Most tables I've been plaing at recently aren't particularly passive and usually have 3-4 to the flop if someone limps in from EP.

I really don't like open limping from that late and QT is really marginal. If I haven't played a hand in a while I will usually go ahead and open raise with QTs and prolly fold QTo from there, from one spot closer to the button I would usually raise with either.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-10-2004, 02:29 PM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again

He had KQo and got a note next to his name for 3-betting me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.