#1
|
|||
|
|||
Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again
One bright spot from yesterday's otherwise crappy pokering.
I'm dealt Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]T [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and open raise from MP. All fold to the button who 3-bets. Blinds fold, and I call. Flop: A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Not a bad flop. I bet out and get raised. I 3bet and he calls. Turn: T [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] I bet, he raises. Well looks like he has a Q too, good thing I'm free-rolling with the nut-flush draw and I happily 3-bet which puts him all-in. River: J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Bingo! And I didn't even get a nh from the table, wtf? Guess you only get those when you win with 92o. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again
Nottom
vnh Since I figure you will enjoy talking about this hand for a while, I have a question. Why did you open raise? Is this not a hand that plays better multi way? Thanks RickA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again
Nottom,
I too was wondering about that open raise? Are you trying to force out some of the lesser Ax's and Kx's? JW |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again
VNH
Did he have a Q(I would hope so)? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again
And oh yeah....
'nh' [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] jw |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again
I too was wondering about that open raise?
If you never open-limped in MP, you wouldn't be making a mistake. His raise is fine as long as the players on his left aren't tough and he himself hasn't been raising liberally. In some cases, it may be a fold. GoT |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again
If you never open-limped in MP, you wouldn't be making a mistake.
What about on a loose passive table in MP with 5 players to act behind you (MP3, CO, button, blinds) with 77? what about 87s? 55? Would you open raise these? You're surely losing a lot from folding them, and you want others in the pot with you with them, and good implied odds. Surely open limping is the only way to go - you're likely to be called in several spots. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
spamuell, are you sure about that?
"...77? what about 87s? 55?...
"You're surely losing <font color="blue"> a lot </font> from folding them" I don't know that you're losing much, if anything. I'd certainly open raise w/ the 77 in that spot, and though I might open-limp w/ 55 (EMP fold, MP limp, LP raise), I don't think I'd lose much by folding it in MP. As for 87s, you're certainly not losing anything by folding it in MP, rather than open-limping. As you said, it's a drawing hand that likes cheap-entry multi-way pots, so it's not worth playing up front or in MP when you have no reason to expect muti-way action. Not to mention the fact that an open limp from MP or LMP is practically begging for a raise from the CO, button or blinds. It would have to be a ridiculously loose passive game for me to open limp 87s in MP. I'd like to hear your thoughts on why I might be wrong. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again
I would raise 77, and usually fold the others.
Most tables I've been plaing at recently aren't particularly passive and usually have 3-4 to the flop if someone limps in from EP. I really don't like open limping from that late and QT is really marginal. If I haven't played a hand in a while I will usually go ahead and open raise with QTs and prolly fold QTo from there, from one spot closer to the button I would usually raise with either. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Took me over a year for the first ... 4 days later here we go again
He had KQo and got a note next to his name for 3-betting me.
|
|
|