Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2004, 03:09 AM
ninja please ninja please is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: cambridge, ma
Posts: 168
Default sklansky doesn\'t appreciate the granny mae!

i was just reading sklansky's "tournament poker for advanced players" and in his discussion of how much to lower your standards when you're short stacked and the blinds are coming (on page 65) he specifically mentions not going as low as the granny mae. of course, he didn't mention it by name, just as Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. i have to assume that it is a typo and he meant to say that you should be sure to raise with it. it'll probably be fixed in the next edition.

anyhow, thought some of you internet folks would find that marginallly interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-06-2004, 03:26 AM
Sleepy Weasel Sleepy Weasel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 175
Default Re: sklansky doesn\'t appreciate the granny mae!

Wow, you're right, I never noticed that before. Sigh. Into the trash it goes.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2004, 04:57 AM
crockpot crockpot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 2,899
Default Re: sklansky doesn\'t appreciate the granny mae!

i think the HFAP example hand where he says you "can play hands as weak as Q5s" is Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. good thing he didn't pick spades for that one too or we'd have to boycott the company altogether.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-06-2004, 06:14 AM
Mike Haven Mike Haven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,288
Default Re: sklansky doesn\'t appreciate the granny mae!

I've asked Mat to ban him from the forums for making disruptive comments.

However, in something as important as this, I'm willing to believe the Printer ran out of [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] symbols and made a catastrophic judgement error.

Although it's sad for TwoPlusTwo to lose such a customer as Mr Sklansky for his future business, they may learn the lesson that in poker there are certain things where it cannot be said, "It depends."

(I've informed Mat that I can't see anyone objecting to allowing Mr S back on the forums if he agrees to recall all books and personally correct the offensive error as his penance.)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2004, 08:11 AM
bigpooch bigpooch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 759
Default Re: sklansky doesn\'t appreciate the granny mae!

How do people get away with it? I remember an acquaintance
of mine raised with 53 of spades but I remembered quite
clearly it was diamonds in the book (Psychology section) and
he won an amazing amount with the hand! I think David must
have chosen the wrong suit! What is his attachment to
diamonds? Aren't spades the boss suit?

I hope in the next edition of HPFAP, those two hands will be
changed to spades!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2004, 10:03 AM
RollaJ RollaJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,695
Default Re: sklansky doesn\'t appreciate the granny mae!

Interesting discussion on this error
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-06-2004, 01:17 PM
jedi jedi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 517
Default Re: sklansky doesn\'t appreciate the granny mae!

I found that Granny Mae also works in a live tournament. I was sitting a NL tournament, the blinds were 25-50. I raised to 200 with Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 5 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] from late position. Flop came J, 7, 5. I bet out another 200 and everyone folded. I opted not to show the hand though, as I think it'd be like pearls to swine.

[ QUOTE ]

thought some of you internet folks would find that marginallly interesting.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-06-2004, 09:39 PM
ramjam ramjam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London SW4
Posts: 655
Default Re: sklansky doesn\'t appreciate the granny mae!

I have just witnessed further proof of the difference in value between Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]5 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and lesser Q5s's. I check in the big blind with Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]5 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. The final board is A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. Whereas Granny Mae would have given me a winner, I was left with a total dog.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.