Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-13-2002, 06:10 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default why not have electronic dealers



I have what I consider an interesting proposition to make. Why can't the casinos set up some kind of poker table without cards? For instance, each player has a chair with a small monitor flat on the table with some kind of visual barrier around it. The dealer would press his keyboard and each plater would receive two perfectly shuffled and cheat-proof cards. Play would proceed as usual and the flop would appear on a larger flat monitor in the middle of the table. Just go from there. Less dealing time, more hands, and much less possiblity of cheating.


Any thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-13-2002, 06:57 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why not have electronic dealers



I'm serious. A combination of video and real B&M poker. Why is it so crazy? More hands per hour. No problems with dealers. Less cheating. etc..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-13-2002, 06:57 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why not have electronic dealers



How would you know who was in the game? How would the show down work? What about stud games?

Sorry, I'm a sucker for tradition. Nice thought, but I don't think I'd care for it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-13-2002, 07:05 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why not have electronic dealers



I know it's a jump but think about it. Same chips, chairs, felt, and rude players. Some indicator could be developed to follow the action and show who is in the game.


Makes sense to me with more hands and less headache, but maybe I have been reading too may GCA posts about cheating.


Anyhoo.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-13-2002, 07:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why not have electronic dealers



I like the line about same rude players! Very funny! Perhaps your device can tell a player what a moron they are when they catch runner-runner gutshot!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-13-2002, 07:29 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why not have electronic dealers



I have been thinking about this recently because, although I love poker, the MAIN beef I have with it is the amount of time it takes to play a session, much of which is from the shuffling, collection, set-ups, deck changes, etc. Would it ever be possible for a casino to have a automatic shuffling machine like they use in blackjack/paigow? I would think that the main reason that this is not feasible is due to the machines high costs.


But would this also take away from the human touch and the absence of people being able to visually see the cards being shuffled? So much so that some players would refuse to play? Just some thoughts, as this is the MAIN advantage that online poker has over B&M poker, in my opinion. Infuse these two together(since it would be rather difficult to get the live fish to play online), and you would have my optimal poker situations. It can't hurt to dream.


DN
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-13-2002, 08:18 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default You\'re all goofy ...



Dealers are like the chlorophyl of poker. Take 'em away, all life stops.


You've heard of a heat sink? Dealers are emotion sinks. Take 'em away, we all go insane.


You think casino poker is about players and cards? Wrong. It's about the house. It's about sales. It's about product, and people, and jobs, and cash flow, no different than cars or toasters.


Tommy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-13-2002, 09:09 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default you,sir, are a genius...



in fact, you could go one step further


we could all sit in our own homes and have the cards transmitted somehow to little screens on our desks - and bet therefrom


we could all "speak" to each other via some form of electronic chatroom


i think you might have hit upon something here


forget tommy - he only plays for social intercourse - he can always go to the pub if he wants to talk to people - sad fellow that he is
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-14-2002, 01:20 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: why not have electronic dealers



All casinos have human blackjack dealers even though they could have eliminated them years ago. But the casinos can't - it would destory the game. Make the game too perfect or antisepic and most people will not play.


"Perfect" games are boring. It is the same old hogwash and wishfull thinking about creating a Utopia. It would be safe and wholesome and clean and efficient and anyone with any wit or intelligence would die of boredom. I would never live in a Utopian society (or play a Utopian game of Poker). Just like the myth of a heaven - sounds good until you actually have to go there. Hell is a much more interesting place - Dante prove that many years ago.


So you can take your clean, antiseptic poker ideas and you can go straight to heaven. That is the only place they will work. I prefer Hell. That is what makes the game of poker worth playing.


Enough said, Methinks. So lets not hear anything more of these silly ideas about making the game better.


Zeno, From Greenland - the land of Ice.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-14-2002, 02:07 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default That must be why slot machines are so unpopular [img]/images/smile.gif[/img]



(Casinos) could have eliminated (dealers) years ago. But...it would destory the game. Make the game too perfect or antisepic and most people will not play. "Perfect" games are boring.


How do you explain the still growing popularity of the "perfect/antiseptic" slot machines, video poker, and keno? These games are getting more space on casino floors while poker rooms are getting squeezed out.



Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.