Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2003, 06:50 PM
MHoydilla MHoydilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 386
Default 30-60 Two Blind hands

30-60 hands from today at the Bellagio:
1. Im in the Small Blind dealt 78s, folded to the button who raises, this is an auto raise as the button would raise here with any 2 cards. I called was this wrong.
2. Im in the Big Blind and dealt K4s and UTG +3 raises everyone folded to me. I have no read UTG +3, I called was this wrong.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2003, 06:56 PM
Schneids Schneids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,084
Default Re: 30-60 Two Blind hands

1. Here I'd 3 bet it, check the flop blind, then if the raiser bets, raise him. Then bet the turn dark. If you don't win the pot, it'll sure confuse the heck out of him and do wonders for your table image. I'm taking some lessons from mike l [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
2. If you have no read on him, I'd just fold and move on. Usually a raise from UTG+3 is slightly better than any two cards, even if it is an open raise.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2003, 06:58 PM
Vehn Vehn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,752
Default Re: 30-60 Two Blind hands

Does a bear s--- in the woods?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2003, 07:42 PM
Inthacup Inthacup is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Inthacup
Posts: 2,706
Default Re: 30-60 Two Blind hands

1. Here I'd 3 bet it, check the flop blind, then if the raiser bets, raise him. Then bet the turn dark. If you don't win the pot, it'll sure confuse the heck out of him and do wonders for your table image. I'm taking some lessons from mike l


Welcome to Variancetown. Right down the road is -EVille
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2003, 10:51 PM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: 30-60 Two Blind hands

"1. Im in the Small Blind dealt 78s, folded to the button who raises, this is an auto raise as the button would raise here with any 2 cards. I called was this wrong."

at first i read this as big blind and i was gonna say "it's better to fold 75% of the time or so and then reraise with it the other times (particularly when you have very strong winning image, feel you can outplay the button and/or button is likely to have lame hands, etc)" but then i saw it was small blind and have to instead say "no, easy fold every time. you need many more players in to play this hand for $40 more."

"2. Im in the Big Blind and dealt K4s and UTG +3 raises everyone folded to me. I have no read UTG +3, I called was this wrong."

that's an atrocious call. id rather have 54s and even then it's a fold. dont hate me, but unless youre rich you shouldnt be playing 30-60 until you have a better handle on these sorts of things.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2003, 11:12 PM
Schneids Schneids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 1,084
Default Re: 30-60 Two Blind hands

[ QUOTE ]
1. Here I'd 3 bet it, check the flop blind, then if the raiser bets, raise him. Then bet the turn dark. If you don't win the pot, it'll sure confuse the heck out of him and do wonders for your table image. I'm taking some lessons from mike l


Welcome to Variancetown. Right down the road is -EVille

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks for the tip [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]. I was lost but now I am found.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2003, 11:32 PM
DanZ DanZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 339
Default Re: 30-60 Two Blind hands

I have not read the other responses.

Calling is very wrong in both places.

Reraising is the only play from the SB.
Folding is the only play vs. an EArly middle raiser with K4s.

I don't know that either play is very opponent dependent, barring some rediculous extremes.

Dan Z.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2003, 12:40 AM
MHoydilla MHoydilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 386
Default Re: 30-60 Two Blind hands

Thanks for the honest reponses its better to here its wrong now then thousands of $$$$$s down the road. As for the "atrocious" comment in retrospect your dead on. Ill continue to ellicit advice as I have a long way to go. FYI I am in no means rich.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-10-2003, 05:45 AM
elysium elysium is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,891
Default Re: 30-60 Two Blind hands

hi mhoy
hand 1) your hand is dominated without the necessary odds. something like Q7o is better in this situation. i know it looks worse than the 87s, but in this situation you must approach your holding not from a suited point of view, but from a high point of view. what i mean by a high point of view is that you ask,"how high am i?". o.k., so how high are you? your 8 high. your answer would be,"i'm 8 high!" i'm 8 high? whew.....a 9 kills me. that's how you must approach the 87s in this situation. add only 2 more opponents and......nope, nope, even by adding 2 more opponents, you are still only 8 high with lousy position. do you know that even stealing from the button with an 8 high is wrong.

when you are not getting correct odds to do anything with your holding, ask "how high am i?" you like a minimum of Q high in this situation. of course any small pair is now considered a made hand, and instead of asking how high you are, ask "how fast and furiously must i fold out with my made hand?" if your hand is very low......a 33 pair for example, you must raise or fold, while a 77 can almost always showdown on the river.

hand 2) you're likely dominated, but since your call closes the action, call. remember though, this is a different situation entirely from hand 1). now you must flop solidly, and there is 3.5-1 to 5-1 that you will flop something solid in this heads up scenario. you can call here. the ev will not be a whole lot different though from what you would get if you took a couple minutes off to stretch. yes! taking a couple minutes off to stretch your legs and rest your eyes has some non-card related positive ev. by the way, does anyone else ever contemplate non-card ev? some people have very high non-card ev, especially those people who think they play well but don't. they get extra ev simply by staying out of the card-room.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.