Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2003, 11:23 PM
MortalNuts MortalNuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CO
Posts: 159
Default 88 folded on 67T flop

I'm at a fairly loose (40% seeing flop) 0.25/0.5 table at Stars. UTG+2 and LMP in the following hand have both struck me during this session as fairly solid -- a bit too loose PF, but reasonable. I have no read on the remaining players.

UTG, I'm dealt 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], and limp in. UTG+2 limps, LMP raises. SB and BB call two cold, I call, UTG2 calls. 5 to the flop.

Flop: T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Blinds check, I bet out. UTG2 raises, LMP 3-bets, it's folded back to me. I fold.

Comments? I'm not crazy about my betting out on the flop, given the PF action -- takes on the best strategy here? In the heat of battle, I thought it was a reasonable bet to find out where I stood.

For what it's worth, I thought there was a reasonable chance of UTG2 capping the betting after I acted.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2003, 12:40 AM
jbc jbc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 60
Default Re: 88 folded on 67T flop

Hmmm. Don't know 'bout the fold here. What were you counting as your outs here? Four nines? Eights may be no good. But, you have a backdoor straight flush draw as well. Interesting. Sounds like UTG2 may have JT and LMP has an overpair.

What happened?

Play well,
jbc
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2003, 10:09 AM
Joe Tall Joe Tall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 4,238
Default Re: 88 folded on 67T flop

I think you are getting 8:1 coming back to you on the flop, it's a borderline flop. With you comment that UTG+2 may cap, then I think your fold is good.

Welcome to the forum,
Joe Tall
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2003, 11:45 AM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cranston, RI
Posts: 4,011
Default Re: 88 folded on 67T flop

That's an awful lot of action preflop to bet out with 2nd pair and backdoor draws on a coordinated board. I'd prefer checking the flop and seeing where the action comes from and folding to any kind of pressure.

Good fold when it's 2 more back to you.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-18-2003, 12:02 PM
Joe Tall Joe Tall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 4,238
Default Re: 88 folded on 67T flop

[ QUOTE ]
That's an awful lot of action preflop to bet out with 2nd pair and backdoor draws on a coordinated board

[/ QUOTE ]

Shizzle, I totally missed that. Checking and possibly calling here would have been the better option.

Thanks Kurn,
JT
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-18-2003, 04:05 PM
MortalNuts MortalNuts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CO
Posts: 159
Default Results/my thoughts (88 fold)

Thanks for the replies, everyone.

I thought this was an interesting hand, and I posted it because I really wasn't sure of my analysis.

I agree that betting out on the flop is very questionable here.

Once it's two bets back to me, I figured UTG2 for either a set, AT, or possibly a strong draw (QJh or something). LMP has certainly played consistently with an overpair to this flop, though a set of Ts, or something like AKh are also possible (imho).

I have the 4 obvious outs (nines), though only 3 of them may be clean. Who counts the 8 outs here, and who doesn't? I don't think there's any really great reason to put either of my opponents on a set of Ts -- if UTG2 has a set, I think 6s or 7s are more likely given his PF limp; plus, even if LMP would raise PF with pocket Ts, he's still more likely to have one of JJ/QQ/KK/AA, all of which I think he would've played this way.

Anyway, point is I have something between 3 and 6 outs (plus the backdoor straight flush, which I didn't really take into account). I'm getting about 8:1 from the pot, which is less than the odds I need for a 4-outer, about what I need for a 5-outer, and more than I need for 6.

The interesting question to me was whether my implied odds are good in this kind of situation (i.e., I can call taking slightly the worst of it, because I figure to make it up later), or negative (I'm going to have to call a lot of expensive bets, possibly without knowing where I really stand, particularly if a heart falls or the board pairs).

I figured the latter, which coupled with my take that I might have only 5 clean outs, made this a pretty clear fold to me. If I had thought that neither UTG2 nor LMP would cap, that both would be passive on the turn and river, *and* that they'd both pay me off if I hit my hand, I might've stayed in. But I didn't think any of those things were true.

So there ya go. Let me have it! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Oh, wait, the results: UTG2 did cap the flop, LMP called. Turn: A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] UTG2 bets out, LMP calls. River: T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] same action. UTG2 had pocket 6s for the full boat, LMP had pocket Js.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.