Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-06-2002, 10:04 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Initial Wogga Poll Results, Day 1....



.....8 for 8 think nuking is no good. Well I'm sure others will chime in and balance the scales


Aside to HDPM: I might just surprise you!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2002, 10:09 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Initial Wogga Poll Results, Day 1....



That would be good. I will leave the possibility open.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-06-2002, 10:43 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Initial Wogga Poll Results, Day 1....



But thanks for letting us know the threat of allowing idiots have control of nuclear weapons.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-06-2002, 11:37 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Your Cheerfulness is so.....



.....underwhelming.


Maybe 1 day you can think without jerking your knee.


Hopefully, this will all become clear to you after a few days of allowing people to chime in on their thoughts
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-06-2002, 02:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default the Palestinians would nuke the Jews



You just need to phrase it in a way the anti-Semites can accept, Dr.Wogga.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-06-2002, 05:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Thanks TOF, I\'ll Count You as \"Yes\" *NM*




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-06-2002, 05:59 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default nope, just showwing the difference



There is no such thing as limited nuclear war, Dr.Wogga.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-07-2002, 10:59 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Disagree. Nagosaki & Hiroshima were what?



...unlimited nuclear war??


Do you agree that our war with Japan probably doean't end if we didn't nuke them? Further, the first radical Arab state that gets nuclear capability is going to use it on Israel ASAP. That seems a given to me - obviously others don't feel the same.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-07-2002, 03:25 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Disagree. Nagosaki & Hiroshima were what?



I think it is damn likely that certain Arab states would nuke Israel if they could. In Iranian newspapers a topic which is fairly often discussed lightly amongst military pundits, is whether it would take one or two nuclear weapons to destroy Israel.


I agree with Kasparov. Militant Islam must be defeated before their offensive capabilities grow much greater, and we must take the offensive to them in order to do it. I don't believe that means nuking them, but I do think it means armies of occupation while we oust the bad leaders and clean out the terrorists and terrorist supporters. I also agree with Kasparov that it means nation-building in the aftermath.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-08-2002, 03:12 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Disagree. Nagosaki & Hiroshima were what?



Dropping the bombs was one choice we had back then. The other choice was to invade Japan and take heavy casualties. Either one would have ended it. The result was horrific, but I'm not second guessing the use of them. War is hell. We gave them a chance to surrender.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.